IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i1-2p94-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ clinical assessments of older clients who are suspected victims of abuse: an exploratory study in community care in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Astrid Sandmoe
  • Marit Kirkevold

Abstract

Aim and objectives. The aim of this study was to explore how nurses in community care experienced clinical assessment of suspected abuse cases and factors impacting on the assessment process. Background. Elder abuse is a serious problem affecting an older person’s health and well‐being. A considerable number of older victims of abuse receive health care services. Health professionals, such as nurses in community care, will very likely meet clients suffering from abuse. In Scandinavia, research about older abuse is quite limited. This also applies to research into nurses’ clinical assessments of older, abused clients under community care services. Design. Qualitative, hermeneutic approach. Method. Ten nurses were recruited by purposeful sampling and interviewed in‐depth. The analysis process was guided by Gadamer’s recommendations on understanding and interpreting oral and written text. Results. Three important phases in the clinical assessment were revealed, including the recognition of a possible abuse situation, an information gathering phase and, finally, judgement and conclusion. Two critical factors impacting on the process included the nurse’s ability to get into position to perform the necessary observations in the home and the quality of the information gathered about the client’s situation. In addition, factors related to the client and the community care organisation influenced the nurses’ work and thereby promoted, delayed or interrupted the clinical assessment. Conclusions. Nurses’ opportunities to identify older, abused clients might fail unless certain conditions are present that facilitate the clinical assessment. In particular, the involvement of the manager is important, in addition to the presence of alliances in the assessment process. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings indicate the need for a framework that may facilitate the systematic clinical assessment of suspected older, abused clients in community care. Such a framework might ensure the quality of the service provided to victims of abuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Astrid Sandmoe & Marit Kirkevold, 2011. "Nurses’ clinical assessments of older clients who are suspected victims of abuse: an exploratory study in community care in Norway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1‐2), pages 94-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:1-2:p:94-102
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03483.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03483.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03483.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:1-2:p:94-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.