Author
Listed:
- Jennifer Kelly
- Alison Eggleton
- David Wright
Abstract
Aim and objectives. To compare medicine administration by two nurses to a patient with swallowing difficulties and: • To assess the safety of medication administration to a patient with dysphagia. • To explore possible system changes to ensure safety standards are understood and adhered to. Background. Administering medicines to patients with dysphagia is complex and nurses need to understand the complexities and safety issues of administering polypharmacy. Design. Undisguised observational study. Method. Undisguised observation was used to collect data on two nurses giving medicines to one patient on separate occasions. Root cause analysis was used to compare and contrast the two incidents to gain an understanding of how nurses interpret and administer multiple medicines to a patient with dysphagia. Results. Administration of medicines by both nurses was not optimal. Several factors conspired to cause this, in particular insufficient staff numbers and skill mix together with inadequate knowledge of how to administer medicines safely to patients with dysphagia. Conclusions. The findings identify the need for continuing professional development (CPD) in medicine administration to provide greater understanding of the contraindications of combining medications and of the legal implications of altering formulations. Relevance to clinical practice. Administering medicines to patients with dysphagia is complex and requires knowledgeable understanding and attention to detail. Clinical areas caring for this client group must be well staffed with skilled, knowledgeable staff if medicines are to be given safely. This requires CPD in administering multiple medications to ensure legal and safety aspects are adhered to.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer Kelly & Alison Eggleton & David Wright, 2011.
"An analysis of two incidents of medicine administration to a patient with dysphagia,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1‐2), pages 146-155, January.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:1-2:p:146-155
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03457.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:1-2:p:146-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.