IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i1-2p127-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability and validity of the Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients (QLQ‐Asthma) in a sample of adult asthmatic patients in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Hicran Aydin Bektas
  • İlkay Kayacan Keser

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aims of this study were to translate the 20‐item Questionnaire for the Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients (QLQ‐Asthma) into Turkish and to assess the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients among Turkish adult asthmatic patients in Turkey. Background. Asthma can adversely affect the physical, psychological and social domains of health‐related quality of life. The Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients is a widely used instrument to measure quality of life in asthma patients. The Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients has not been validated in Turkey. Design. Methodological research design. Methods. This study describes the translation process of Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients into Turkish and tests its reliability and validity on quality of life in asthma patients. The study group was composed of 105 stable adult asthmatic patients. The questionnaire was translated using a back‐translation technique. The statistical analysis was carried out using Cronbach’s alpha to test the internal consistency of the Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients scale while exploratory factor analysis was carried out using principal component analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser Normalisation to test its construct validity. Results. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient reliability for the total scale was 0·84, and internal consistency reliability was in the acceptable range for this instrument. Results indicated that respondents did not have difficulty answering the questions in the Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients. Factor analysis resulted in five‐factor structure: physical activities, role activities, emotions, social activities and health perceptions. Conclusions. The Turkish version of the Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients is a reliable and valid supplementary measure of the quality of life in asthma patients, and it is a useful outcome measurement tool for clinical trials conducted in Turkey. Relevance of clinical practice. The Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients scale is simple to administer, and Turkish researchers and health care providers can use the Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients to assess the asthma patients quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Hicran Aydin Bektas & İlkay Kayacan Keser, 2011. "Reliability and validity of the Assessment of Quality of Life in Asthma Patients (QLQ‐Asthma) in a sample of adult asthmatic patients in Turkey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1‐2), pages 127-135, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:1-2:p:127-135
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03465.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03465.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03465.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:1-2:p:127-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.