IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i9-10p1371-1377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Educating patients to evaluate web‐based health care information: the GATOR approach to healthy surfing

Author

Listed:
  • Bryan A Weber
  • David J Derrico
  • Saunjoo L Yoon
  • Pamela Sherwill‐Navarro

Abstract

Aims and objectives. Teaching patients to assess web resources effectively has become an important need in primary care. The acronym GATOR (genuine, accurate, trustworthy, origin and readability), an easily memorized strategy for assessing web‐based health information, is presented in this paper. Background. Despite the fact that many patients consult the World‐Wide Web (or Internet) daily to find information related to health concerns, a lack of experience, knowledge, or education may limit ability to accurately evaluate health‐related sites and the information they contain. Health information on the Web is not subject to regulation, oversight, or mandatory updates and sites are often transient due to ever changing budget priorities. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, for patients to develop a list of stable sites containing current, reliable information. Design. Commentary aimed at improving patient’s use of web based health care information. Conclusions. The GATOR acronym is easy to remember and understand and may assist patients in making knowledgeable decisions as they traverse through the sometimes misleading and often overwhelming amount of health information on the Web. Relevance to clinical practice. The GATOR acronym provides a mechanism that can be used to structure frank discussion with patients and assist in health promotion through education. When properly educated about how to find and evaluate Web‐based health information, patients may avoid negative consequences that result from trying unsafe recommendations drawn from untrustworthy sites. They may also be empowered to not only seek more information about their health conditions, treatment and available alternatives, but also to discuss their feelings, ideas and concerns with their healthcare providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryan A Weber & David J Derrico & Saunjoo L Yoon & Pamela Sherwill‐Navarro, 2010. "Educating patients to evaluate web‐based health care information: the GATOR approach to healthy surfing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1371-1377, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:9-10:p:1371-1377
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02762.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02762.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02762.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Judith Aponte & Kathleen M. Nokes, 2017. "Validating an electronic health literacy scale in an older hispanic population," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2703-2711, September.
    2. Jean Gilmour & Sue Hanna & Helen Chan & Alison Strong & Annette Huntington, 2014. "Engaging With Patient Online Health Information Use," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:9-10:p:1371-1377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.