IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i9-10p1284-1288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of crossing legs on blood pressure in hypertensive patients

Author

Listed:
  • Rukiye Pinar
  • Sıddıka Ataalkin
  • Roger Watson

Abstract

Aims. The aim of this study was to examine whether there is any difference between BP readings with patients crossing a leg at the knee level and uncrossing during BP measurement. Background. It is clear that numerous factors influence an individual’s blood pressure (BP) measurement. However, guidelines for accurately measuring BP inconsistently specify that the patient should keep feet flat on the floor. Design. Repeated measures. Method. Using a mercury‐filled column sphygmomanometer, BP was measured at uncrossed leg position, crossed leg position and again at uncrossed leg position in 283 unmedicated or medicated patients. Three experienced nurses specially trained for the study performed BP measurements. Results. The results indicated that BP increased significantly with the crossed leg position. Systolic and diastolic BP significantly increased approximately 10 and 8 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion. Crossing the leg at knee results in a significant increase in BP. Relevance to clinical practice. Leg position during measurement of BP should be standardised and mentioned in publications.

Suggested Citation

  • Rukiye Pinar & Sıddıka Ataalkin & Roger Watson, 2010. "The effect of crossing legs on blood pressure in hypertensive patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1284-1288, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:9-10:p:1284-1288
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03148.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03148.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03148.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:9-10:p:1284-1288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.