IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i9-10p1226-1235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A concept analysis of autonomy for older people in residential care

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Welford
  • Kathy Murphy
  • Meredith Wallace
  • Dympna Casey

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To undertake a concept analysis (CA) of residential autonomy to identify its attributes. To reveal the antecedents and consequences of autonomy for older people in residential care and thus enable this concept to be operationalised. Background. Globally, there is an ageing population. This population and their families demand that services offer choice and recognise the older individual in care relationships. Design. Concept analysis. Methods. Using the same search terms, findings from a literature search in 2007 and from a follow‐up search in 2009 were used to conduct the CA. Rodgers (1989) framework was used to develop a model case of autonomy for older people in residential care. The attributes, antecedents, consequences and references were delineated. Results. Six attributes of autonomy for older people in residential care were delineated. (1) Residents are involved in decision making while their capacity is encouraged and maintained. (2) Residents delegate their care needs based on the right to self‐determination and this can be achieved through (3) negotiated care planning, which is encouraged through open and respectful communication and (4) including families or significant others when the resident is cognitively impaired. (5) The residential unit operates a culture and atmosphere of flexibility within an ethos of maintaining resident dignity. (6) Meaningful relationships are enabled by the presence of regular and motivated staff, and these relationships enhance the residents’ opportunities to be autonomous. Conclusions. A CA framework is useful in trying to understand a term in its context and thus make it operational. Relevance to clinical practice. This CA is the first step required for further research on this aspect of care. This is essential in informing this nursing specialty. The attributes, antecedents and consequences can now be used to operationalise the concept in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Welford & Kathy Murphy & Meredith Wallace & Dympna Casey, 2010. "A concept analysis of autonomy for older people in residential care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1226-1235, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:9-10:p:1226-1235
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03185.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03185.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03185.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaana Koskenniemi & Helena Leino‐Kilpi & Pauli Puukka & Riitta Suhonen, 2019. "Respect and its associated factors as perceived by older patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3848-3857, November.
    2. Ines Wulff & Marita Kölzsch & Sonja Kalinowski & Kirsten Kopke & Thomas Fischer & Reinhold Kreutz & Dagmar Dräger, 2013. "Perceived enactment of autonomy of nursing home residents: A German cross‐sectional study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 186-193, June.
    3. Agneta Breitholtz & Ingrid Snellman & Ingegerd Fagerberg, 2013. "Living with Uncertainty: Older Persons’ Lived Experience of Making Independent Decisions over Time," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-8, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:9-10:p:1226-1235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.