Author
Abstract
Aims and objectives. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in patients with arthritis, the types of complementary and alternative medicine used, pertinent socio‐demographic factors associated with complementary and alternative medicine use and its perceived efficacy. Background. Arthritis is a major health issue, and the use of complementary and alternative medicine among patients with arthritis is common. Design. This is a descriptive cross‐sectional study. Methods. Data were obtained from 250 patients with arthritis at the physiotherapy and immunology clinics Atatürk University Hospital in eastern Turkey between May–July 2005 using a questionnaire developed specifically for this study. The instrument included questions on socio‐demographic information, disease specifics and complementary and alternative medicine usage. Results. Seventy‐six per cent of participants reported use of at least one form of complementary and alternative medicine in the previous year. Complementary and alternative medicine users and non‐users were not significantly different in most socio‐demographic characteristics including age, gender, marital status and education level with the exception of economic status. We categorised treatment into six complementary and alternative medicine categories: 62·6% of patients used thermal therapies; 41·5% used oral herbal therapies; 40·5% used hot therapies; 32·6% used externally applied (skin) therapies; 28·4% used massage and 12·6% used cold therapies. All forms of complementary and alternative medicine except thermal and oral herbal therapies were perceived as very effective by more than half of study participants. Conclusions. Complementary and alternative medicine therapy is widely used by patients with arthritis and has perceived beneficial effects. Relevance to clinical practice. It is important for nurses and other health care professionals to be knowledgeable about the use of complementary and alternative medicine therapies when providing care to patients with arthritis because of possible interactions with other treatments, delays in seeking care and the potential for poor quality products. It is also essential for health professionals to discuss treatment options with patients and to monitor treatment efficacy.
Suggested Citation
Ayla Ünsal & Sebahat Gözüm, 2010.
"Use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with arthritis,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(7‐8), pages 1129-1138, April.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:7-8:p:1129-1138
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03111.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:7-8:p:1129-1138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.