IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i5-6p803-810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer learning partnerships: exploring the experience of pre‐registration nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Christiansen
  • Amelia Bell

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This paper explores the impact of a peer learning initiative developed to facilitate, purposefully, mutually supportive learning relationships between student nurses in the practice setting. Background. Finding effective strategies to support learning in the practice setting has been the focus of professional concern for a considerable time. In the UK clinical mentorship is seen as pivotal to ensuring fitness to practice; however, recent debate on the nature of learning has revealed the clinical workplace as a rich learning environment where learning occurs not only through hierarchical relationships, but also from a network of peer relationships. Formalising peer relationships through peer assisted learning is increasingly suggested as a strategy to support workplace learning and support novice students’ transition to the clinical setting. Despite the developing literature in this field there is limited understanding about how students experience facilitated peer relationships. Design. An interpretive qualitative design. Methods. Focus group interviews were used to collect interactive and situated discourse from nursing students who had recently participated in peer learning partnerships (n = 54). Narrative data were analysed thematically. Results. Findings suggest that active support from a fellow student reduced the feelings of social isolation experienced by novice students in initial clinical placements, helping them to deal more effectively with the challenges faced and reducing the factors that have an impact on attrition. In addition, the reciprocity of the peer learning partnerships facilitated understanding of mentorship and created a heightened sense of readiness for registration and professional practice. Conclusions. Peer learning partnerships facilitated by mentors in clinical practice can support the transition to nursing for first year students and can help more experienced students gain a confidence and a heightened readiness for mentorship and registered practice. Relevance to practice. Facilitated peer learning partnerships can enhance the student experience in the practice setting and can help maximise opportunities for learning and support. This suggests that peer assisted learning is a legitimate area for innovation and further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Christiansen & Amelia Bell, 2010. "Peer learning partnerships: exploring the experience of pre‐registration nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5‐6), pages 803-810, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:803-810
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02981.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02981.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02981.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brett Williams & Lisa McKenna & Jill French & Simon Dousek, 2013. "Measurement properties of a peer‐teaching scale for nursing education," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 368-373, September.
    2. Anne Marie Lunde Husebø & Marianne Storm & Bodil Bø Våga & Adriana Rosenberg & Kristin Akerjordet, 2018. "Status of knowledge on student‐learning environments in nursing homes: A mixed‐method systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1344-1359, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:803-810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.