IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i5-6p728-735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paediatric nurses' understanding of the process and procedure of double‐checking medications

Author

Listed:
  • Annette Dickinson
  • Elaine McCall
  • Bernadette Twomey
  • Natalie James

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To understand paediatric nurses’ understanding and practice regarding double‐checking medication and identify facilitators and barriers to the process of independent double‐checking (IDC). Background. A system of double‐checking medications has been proposed as a way of minimising medication error particularly in situations involving high‐risk medications, complex processes such as calculating doses, or high‐risk patient populations such as infants and children. While recommendations have been made in support of IDC in paediatric settings little is known about nursing practice and the facilitators and barriers to this process. Design. A descriptive qualitative design was used. Methods. Data were collected via three focus group interviews. Six to seven paediatric nurses participated in homogenous groups based on level of practice. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that, while IDC is accepted and promoted as best practice in a paediatric setting, there is a lack of clarity as to what this means. This study supports other studies in relation to the influence of workload, distraction and environmental factors on the administration process but highlights the need for more research in relation to the impact of the power dynamic between junior and senior nurses. The issue of automaticity has been unexplored in relation to nursing practice but this study indicates that this may have an important influence on how care is delivered to patients. Relevance to clinical practice. While the focus of this study was in the paediatric setting, the findings have relevance to other settings and population groups. The adoption of IDC in health care settings must have in place: policy and guidelines that clearly define the process of checking, educational support, an environment that supports peer critique and review, well‐designed medication areas and accessible resources to support drug administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Annette Dickinson & Elaine McCall & Bernadette Twomey & Natalie James, 2010. "Paediatric nurses' understanding of the process and procedure of double‐checking medications," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5‐6), pages 728-735, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:728-735
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03130.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03130.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03130.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alwiena J Blignaut & Siedine K Coetzee & Hester C Klopper & Suria M Ellis, 2017. "Medication administration errors and related deviations from safe practice: an observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3610-3623, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:728-735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.