IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i5-6p721-727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing and standardising the use of peripheral vascular access devices

Author

Listed:
  • Dean Easterlow
  • Phill Hoddinott
  • Stephanie Harrison

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To assess the impact of a change initiative relating to the use of peripheral intravenous cannulae on healthcare‐acquired infections in an acute hospital trust in London, UK. Background. The prevalence of healthcare‐acquired infections has increased in the UK in recent years. Causal factors include poor practice and declining standards of cleanliness and hygiene in healthcare settings. Design. Implementation of a change management initiative. Methods. A baseline audit was conducted to identify areas for change. Based on the audit findings, a change initiative was implemented which included the introduction of a new, non‐ported needle‐safe cannula, together with changes in practices relating to peripheral intravenous cannulae care. Results. In the eight months postintroduction of the new cannulae, decreases of 53% and 35% were reported in the number of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and healthcare‐acquired infection cases, respectively, compared with the same period prior to implementation. Audits results also demonstrated considerable improvements in practices relating to cannula care following implementation of the change initiative. Conclusions. A change in culture, the adoption of a non‐ported cannula and improvements in practices relating to peripheral intravenous cannulae care led to significant reductions in healthcare‐acquired infections during the period of the study. Relevance to clinical practice. The adoption of appropriate cannulae and administration sets to minimise infection risk can help to reduce the incidence of methicillin‐resistant S. aureus and healthcare‐acquired infection cases resulting from peripheral venous cannulation. Training and support to encourage the adoption of best practice, in conjunction with regular follow‐up audits, can lead to a reduction in infection rates and general improvements in the quality of peripheral line care. The findings of this study provide similar institutions with evidence to guide decision‐making on cannula care.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean Easterlow & Phill Hoddinott & Stephanie Harrison, 2010. "Implementing and standardising the use of peripheral vascular access devices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5‐6), pages 721-727, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:721-727
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03098.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03098.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03098.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelvin Wong & Alannah Cooper & Janie Brown & Leanne Boyd & Michele Levinson, 2018. "The prevalence of peripheral intravenous cannulae and pattern of use: A point prevalence in a private hospital setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 363-367, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:721-727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.