IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i5-6p691-700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients’ recovery after critical illness at early follow‐up

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle A Kelly
  • Sharon McKinley

Abstract

Aim. To determine the quality of life, particularly physical function, of intensive care survivors during the early recovery process. Background. Survivors of critical illness face ongoing challenges after discharge from the intensive care unit and on returning home. Knowledge about health issues during early phases of recovery after hospital discharge is emerging, yet still limited. Design. Descriptive study where the former critically ill patients completed instruments on general health and quality of life (SF‐36) in the first six months of recovery. Methods. Participants responded to the SF‐36 questionnaire and questions about problems, one to six months after intensive care, either face‐to‐face or by telephone. Results. Thirty‐nine participants had a mean age of 60 years; of them, 59% were men and had been in intensive care for 1–69 days (median = 5). Most participants (69%) rated their health as good or fair, but 54% rated general health as worse than a year ago. Mean quality of life scores for all scales ranged from 25–65·5%, with particularly low scores for Role‐Physical (25) and Pain (45·1). Half the participants reported difficulty with mobility, sleep and concentration, and 72% that their responsibilities at home had changed. No relationships were found between SF‐36 scores and admission diagnosis, gender, age or length of intensive care stay. Conclusions. These survivors of critical illness and hospitalisation in an intensive care unit perceive their general health to be good despite experiencing significant physical limitations and disturbed sleep during recovery. Relevance to clinical practice. Knowledge of issues in these early phases of recovery and discussion and resolution of patient problems could normalise the experience for the patient and help to facilitate better quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle A Kelly & Sharon McKinley, 2010. "Patients’ recovery after critical illness at early follow‐up," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5‐6), pages 691-700, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:691-700
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03117.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03117.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03117.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee Cutler, 2010. "Commentary on Kelly MA & McKinley S (2010) Patient’s recovery after critical illness at early follow‐up. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19, 691–700," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3251-3252, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:691-700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.