IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i5-6p666-672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient symptoms after colonic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery – a long‐term follow‐up

Author

Listed:
  • Berith Wennström
  • Margareta Warrén Stomberg
  • Marina Modin
  • Stefan Skullman

Abstract

Aims. The main purpose of this study was to analyse, prospectively, patient symptoms during the first four weeks following elective colon surgery. A secondary aim was to find areas to improve inpatient information and postoperative care. Background. Fast‐track recovery following colon surgery has been proven beneficial to patients in the early postoperative phase. Less is known about the continuous recovery at home. Design. A prospective follow‐up survey. Methods. Consecutive patients (n = 32) planned for elective colon surgery were evaluated. Both open and laparoscopic operations were included. All followed a fast‐track protocol in hospital. Patient symptoms were recorded by validated quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ‐C 30, EORTC QLQ‐CR 38 and Brief Pain Inventory). An interview was conducted five weeks and one year after surgery. Results. The hospital stay was six days, and 10% of patients were readmitted. The fast‐track concept worked well. The main problems after discharge were fatigue, nausea and bowel disturbances. Pain was not a significant issue. Most symptoms had disappeared after four weeks. Conclusions. The first period at home is troublesome, and better information about common symptoms is needed. A direct telephone line has been set up to answer questions and to lower patient anxiety. Relevance to clinical practice. Clinical guidelines for patient’s discharge planning can be performed based on the results from this study. Further improvement regarding the epidural anaesthesia is needed to reduce minor side effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Berith Wennström & Margareta Warrén Stomberg & Marina Modin & Stefan Skullman, 2010. "Patient symptoms after colonic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery – a long‐term follow‐up," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5‐6), pages 666-672, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:666-672
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03099.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03099.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03099.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen Schultz & Niels Qvist & Christian B Mogensen & Birthe D Pedersen, 2014. "Discharge from an emergency department observation unit and a surgical assessment unit: experiences of patients with acute abdominal pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2779-2789, October.
    2. Mark Mitchell, 2015. "Home recovery following day surgery: a patient perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 415-427, February.
    3. Jenny Jakobsson & Ewa Idvall & Christine Kumlien, 2017. "The lived experience of recovery during the first 6 months after colorectal cancer surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4498-4505, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:666-672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.