IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i3-4p461-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fitness for practice in nursing and midwifery education in Scotland, United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Holland
  • Michelle Roxburgh
  • Martin Johnson
  • Keith Topping
  • Roger Watson
  • William Lauder
  • Mary Porter

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this paper is to report findings from a major study that evaluated the Fitness for Practice nursing and midwifery curriculum in Scotland, UK. Background. The competence of student nurses and midwives at the point of registration has been the focus of debate and research. However, no major study, on such a large scale, had specifically evaluated pre‐registration programmes to determine whether they enabled students to achieve ‘fitness to practice’. Design. The study had a broad evaluation design conducted in three phases using a mixed methodology. Method. Phase 1 involved questionnaires, Objective Structured Clinical Examination's (OSCE) and curriculum evaluation. Phase 2 involved semi‐structured interviews (some telephone) and focus groups across main stakeholders: students (n = 78), mentors (n = 78), practice‐education facilitators (n = 24), academics (n = 59), senior clinical (n = 46) and education managers (n = 16), service users and carers (n = 10). Results. The findings suggest that the Fitness for Practice curriculum model in Scotland has on the whole been successful. The key finding is the predominant opinion of stakeholders that newly qualified nurses and midwives are perceived as being fit for practice at the point of registration. A perceived lack of confidence is, as with all transitions to new roles, an understandable outcome. Conclusions. Previous concern that student nurses and midwives are not ‘fit for practice’ has focused on the perceived lack of clinical skills at the point of registration, not on competence to practice in general. This study demonstrates that this is an important distinction and recognises that registration is only the beginning of a life long learning experience. Relevance to clinical practice. Students need to be supported to develop their confidence following registration as well as additional skills in their chosen field of practice. Appropriate mentorship and a period of preceptorship should be in place to accommodate this.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Holland & Michelle Roxburgh & Martin Johnson & Keith Topping & Roger Watson & William Lauder & Mary Porter, 2010. "Fitness for practice in nursing and midwifery education in Scotland, United Kingdom," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 461-469, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:461-469
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03056.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03056.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03056.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristiina Helminen & Martin Johnson & Hannu Isoaho & Hannele Turunen & Kerttu Tossavainen, 2017. "Final assessment of nursing students in clinical practice: Perspectives of nursing teachers, students and mentors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4795-4803, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:461-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.