IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i3-4p389-397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The essentials of Advance Care Planning for end‐of‐life care for older people

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Yeun‐Sim Jeong
  • Isabel Higgins
  • Margaret McMillan

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim of the study was to investigate the phenomenon of Advance Care Planning and the use of Advance Care Directives in residential aged care facilities in Australia. The objectives were to: • investigate the implementation process of Advance Care Planning and the use of Advance Care Directives; • investigate the outcomes of Advance Care Planning and experiences of people involved in Advance Care Planning and Advance Care Directives, including residents, families and nursing staff. Background. Benefits of Advance Care Planning for older residents are considerable given their degenerative health‐breakdown and minimal chance of recovery. To date, the use of Advance Care Planning and Advance Care Directives is limited and models of service delivery and processes are needed to enhance best practice with Advance Care Planning and positive outcomes for older Australians. Design. Case study. Methods. The study conducted using multiple sources of evidence to enrich understanding of the phenomenon of Advance Care Planning. The researcher engaged in data collection over six months involving participant observation, field notes, semi‐structured interviews and document analysis. The findings contribute to the limited knowledge of options currently available to older adults and their families in their decision‐making about end‐of‐life care options. Permission to conduct the study. Prior to commencement of the data collection, ethics clearances from the University of Newcastle and the regional Area Health Service were achieved. Permission to access the residential aged care facilities to undertake the study was obtained from the relevant residential aged care facility ethics committees or designated authorities. The researcher undertook several strategies to ensure all the ethical principles were considered and adhered to while conducting the project. Results. The research identified the components and factors involved in the Advance Care Planning process and in attaining desired outcomes. The conceptual framework developed elaborates how Advance Care Planning should be implemented and what may constitute successful implementation of Advance Care Planning in residential aged care facilities. The four main elements (input, throughput, output, feedback), and 20 sub‐elements were requisites for nurses to initiate and implement the Advance Care Planning. Conclusion. The essential components for end‐of‐life care are identified in the implementation processes of Advance Care Planning in residential aged care facilities. The study contributes to greater awareness of the processes needed for ‘dying well’ and highlights the need to explore experiences of ‘successful dying’ and the way nurses contribute to these events. Relevance to clinical practice. The case study identified four determinative requisites for successful implementation of Advance Care Planning in aged care facilities: the expert nurse, discussion, education and involvement of a multidisciplinary team. Nurses should take these factors into account and use person‐centred approach in formalised processes to encourage participation in plans for end‐of‐life care.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Yeun‐Sim Jeong & Isabel Higgins & Margaret McMillan, 2010. "The essentials of Advance Care Planning for end‐of‐life care for older people," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 389-397, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:389-397
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03001.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03001.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03001.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon, M.Z. & O'Donnell, L. & Jennings, B. & Guilfoy, V. & Wolf, S.M. & Nolan, K. & Jackson, R. & Koch-Weser, D. & Donnelley, S., 1993. "Decisions near the end of life: Professional views on life-sustaining treatments," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(1), pages 14-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Wen-Yu & Huang, Chien-Hsun & Chiu, Tai-Yuan & Hung, Shou-Hung & Peng, Jen-Kuei & Chen, Ching-Yu, 2010. "Factors that influence the participation of healthcare professionals in advance care planning for patients with terminal cancer: A nationwide survey in Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1701-1704, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:389-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.