Author
Listed:
- Aynur Uysal
- Ayla Bayik Temel
- Melek Ardahan
- Sukran Ozkahraman
Abstract
Aim and objective. This study was conducted to identify barriers to research utilisation in practice among nurses in Turkey. Background. It is clear from the nursing literature that there are several factors that can impede the use of research in practice. It is important that these are identified and addressed. Design. Survey. Method. This descriptive study was carried out with 216 nurses from government and private hospitals in Izmir between January–April 2007. The data collection instrument used for the study consisted of the Barriers to Research Utilization Scale and a self‐administered questionnaire form that contained demographic data, educational background and nurses’ involvement in research activities. Results. More than half of the nurses did not receive research education before graduation, and 85·2% did not receive an in‐service education. Only 58·3% of nurses give great importance to research, and 24·5% are interested in research. Involvement in research activities is inadequate. Five out of the top 10 barriers were related to ‘setting’, three to ‘nurse’ and two to ‘presentation’. Educational level, undergraduate research education and involvement in research activities were predictor factors of perceived barriers to research utilisation. Conclusions. Identifying the barriers to research utilisation is the first step in overcoming the barriers. It is hoped that research capability in the health care field in Turkey can be enhanced. Creating an organisational climate that values research use and supports nurses to participate in such activities is crucial. Relevance to clinical practice. The study findings provide key factors and the top barriers to research utilisation to nurse administrators in developing strategies to increase the utilisation of research findings in clinical practices.
Suggested Citation
Aynur Uysal & Ayla Bayik Temel & Melek Ardahan & Sukran Ozkahraman, 2010.
"Barriers to research utilisation among nurses in Turkey,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3443-3452, December.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3443-3452
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03318.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3443-3452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.