IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i21-22p3235-3243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paediatric catheterisation: exploring and understanding children’s nurses’ perceptions and practice in an acute setting

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Bray
  • Caroline Sanders
  • Anita Flynn

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This research study explored the factors which influenced the ability of children’s nurses to urethrally catheterise children in their care. Background. There is currently limited evidence to inform the clinical skills training of children’s nurses and the impact of competencies and other educational documents on practice. The project aimed to use data to inform local service provision and the design and development of future training programmes in an acute paediatric hospital. Design. A mixed method study using questionnaires and focus groups. Methods. Data were obtained through two focus groups (n = 10) and questionnaires (n = 34, response rate 88%) with trained children’s nurses to explore the influencing factors on their ability to conduct this clinical skill. Results. The children’s nurses discussed that barriers to being competent and confident to catheterise included a lack of exposure to the clinical skill, increasing awareness of the role of competencies and litigation and the presence of specialist roles. Current catheterisation training was evaluated positively with most nurses stating their knowledge and clinical skills had increased; despite this only 55% (n = 18) identified that would feel able to catheterise a child in their care. Conclusions. Comprehensive training of all children’s nurses in an acute care setting may not provide a workforce, which is competent and confident in urethrally catheterising children, and resources for training may be more appropriately deployed to ensure the optimum care of children and families. Relevance to clinical practice. This study highlights the difficulties encountered for clinical nurses to remain competent in infrequently used clinical skills. This has relevance to the challenges of providing a multi‐skilled workforce in children’s nursing.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Bray & Caroline Sanders & Anita Flynn, 2010. "Paediatric catheterisation: exploring and understanding children’s nurses’ perceptions and practice in an acute setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3235-3243, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:3235-3243
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03414.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03414.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03414.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ann Bonner & Jennifer Greenwood, 2006. "The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 480-489, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:3235-3243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.