IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i21-22p3218-3226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ medication work: what do nurses know?

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Folkmann
  • Janet Rankin

Abstract

Aims. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the way that medication work is conceptualised in the literature and introduce a cautionary note into the enthusiasm with which nurses’ medication work is currently being reformed. Background. This article is an overview outlining how nurses’ medication work is discursively organised and known about authoritatively. There is a great deal of safety and coordination work that nurses undertake in relation to the ‘task’ of administering medications that remains hidden and misunderstood in the dominant ways that knowledge about medication administration is structured. Technological innovations are eagerly embraced, but we posit that these strategies may be having an impact on nursing work with medications in unknown and potentially deleterious ways. We develop a critical analysis of the discursively limiting frameworks of biomedical science, law, management and safety through which nurses’ medication practices are currently framed. This analysis provides insight into the ideologies and power relations that are taken up by nurses. The analytic work presented here informs an institutional ethnographic study that, at the time of this publication, is currently in the first stage of data collection. The study promises to contribute new knowledge about medication work as nurses know it. Design. A discursive paper including a selective critical analysis of the descriptive, theoretical and empirical literature. Methods. Databases were searched using the keywords medication work, medication administration and medication error. Conclusion. The enthusiasm with which technological innovations are being introduced must be tempered with equal attention to the impact that this has on nursing work. Relevance to clinical practice. The way that medication work is conceptualised is constraining and covers over much of what actually happens in everyday nursing practice. Technological innovations change practice, often in unintended or unknown ways. Explicating the actuality of medication work offers an enhanced understanding and allows nurses to appraise critically the ways their work has been transformed.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Folkmann & Janet Rankin, 2010. "Nurses’ medication work: what do nurses know?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3218-3226, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:3218-3226
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03249.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03249.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03249.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emily Rohde & Elizabeth Domm, 2018. "Nurses’ clinical reasoning practices that support safe medication administration: An integrative review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 402-411, February.
    2. Pilar Fuster-Linares & Cristina Alfonso-Arias & Alberto Gallart Fernández-Puebla & Encarna Rodríguez-Higueras & Silvia García-Mayor & Isabel Font-Jimenez & Mireia Llaurado-Serra, 2022. "Assessing Nursing Students’ Self-Perceptions about Safe Medication Management: Design and Validation of a Tool, the NURSPeM," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:3218-3226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.