IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i21-22p3161-3170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring professional competency of public health nurses: development of a scale and psychometric evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Chouh‐Jiaun Lin
  • Chi‐Ho Hsu
  • Tsai‐Chung Li
  • Nigel Mathers
  • Yu‐Chu Huang

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To develop an instrument to measure public health nurse competencies in Taiwan and to test its psychometric properties. Background. Core competencies for public health nursing practice have been established in the USA and elsewhere but no equivalent studies have been undertaken in Taiwan. Design. Postal survey of self‐administered questionnaire to 1534 full‐time public health nurses (response rate 67·3%). Methods. The Public Health Nurse Professional Competency Scale was based on a literature review, the six key competencies identified by the Taiwan Nurses Association and the ‘typical’ tasks reported by nursing researchers. The scale comprised four domains and 38 items using a four‐point Likert scale. Validity and reliability of the scale were determined by a seven‐member professional panel and the content validity calculated for each domain. Discriminatory power and the item‐total correlation index were used to analyse and eliminate items. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed and factor analysis to test the dimensions of the scale – stability was determined by interscale correlations, internal and test–retest reliability. Results. The mean age of respondents was 40·6 years (SD 8·54) with the majority holding an associate degree (67·0%). Participants had worked for an average of 11·7 years (SD 9·20) and 74·4% held a registered nurse license. The scale had strong content validity (Indices > 0·8) and good test–retest reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0·93–0·97). Nine items were excluded during factor analysis and three factors accounted for 46–82% of the total variance: (1) basic‐care, (2) community health management and (3) combined teaching and self‐development competencies. The scale had high discriminant validity. Conclusions. A Public Health Nurse Professional Competency Scale has been developed and shown to have good reliability and validity. Relevance to clinical practice. The scale can be used to assess the competencies of Public Health Nurses in Taiwan and improve the quality of clinical services provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Chouh‐Jiaun Lin & Chi‐Ho Hsu & Tsai‐Chung Li & Nigel Mathers & Yu‐Chu Huang, 2010. "Measuring professional competency of public health nurses: development of a scale and psychometric evaluation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3161-3170, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:3161-3170
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03149.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03149.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03149.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Halcomb & Moira Stephens & Julianne Bryce & Elizabeth Foley & Christine Ashley, 2016. "Nursing competency standards in primary health care: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1193-1205, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:3161-3170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.