IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i21-22p3023-3030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inter‐rater and intra‐rater reliability of nursing process records for patients with schizophrenia

Author

Listed:
  • Min‐Huey Chung
  • I‐Jen Chiang
  • Kuei‐Ru Chou
  • Hsin Chu
  • Hsiu‐Ju Chang

Abstract

Aims. This study explored the inter‐rater and intra‐rater reliability to evaluate the consistency of nursing process records for patients with schizophrenia. Background. By writing accurate and complete nursing process records, nurses can quickly communicate the care that has been delivered. However, little is known about the accuracy of nursing records to reflect the patients’ problems, especially in psychiatry. Design. A prospective observational study. Methods. Two nurses with similar work experience in psychiatric wards assessed patient records produced by 14 psychiatric nurses to compute inter‐rater reliability of nursing diagnoses and their defining characteristics. Collecting the records and the time spans between the first and the second data collection took one month to compute the intra‐reliability of the nursing diagnoses by the same nurse. Results. The greatest intra‐rater consistency was in identifying ‘disturbed thought processes’ (kappa = 0·77, 95% CI: 0·56–0·98). A moderate level of inter‐rater agreement among nurses was observed for the nursing diagnoses of ‘disturbed thought process’ and ‘disturbed sleep pattern’ from 0·41–0·53. Furthermore, the inter‐rater agreement of among nurses with less work experience (less than four years) showed greater higher consistency on ‘disturbed thought process’ (kappa = 0·56, 95% CI: 0·23–0·89) and ‘disturbed sleep pattern’ (kappa = 0·41, 95% CI: 0·07–0·73) than that observed among nurses with more work experience (more than four years). Conclusions. Overall, intra‐rater reliability was greater than inter‐rater reliability for psychiatric nursing process records. Furthermore, more inter‐rater and intra‐rater agreement were observed among records from less experienced nurses than among records produced by more experienced ones. To evaluate the consistency of nursing process records, both the intra‐rater reliability and the inter‐rater reliability show the importance of using standardised terms and more detailed nursing records. Relevance to clinical practice. Our results clearly indicate that using standardised terms to describe patient symptoms and more detailed descriptions of the nursing process could improve the accuracy of nursing records.

Suggested Citation

  • Min‐Huey Chung & I‐Jen Chiang & Kuei‐Ru Chou & Hsin Chu & Hsiu‐Ju Chang, 2010. "Inter‐rater and intra‐rater reliability of nursing process records for patients with schizophrenia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3023-3030, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:3023-3030
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03301.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03301.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03301.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:3023-3030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.