IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i21-22p2997-3005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subgroups of haemodialysis patients in relation to fluid intake restrictions: a cluster analytical approach

Author

Listed:
  • Magnus Lindberg
  • Björn Wikström
  • Per Lindberg

Abstract

Aims. To determine whether definable subgroups exist in a sample of haemodialysis patients with regard to self‐efficacy, attentional style and depressive symptomatology and to compare whether interdialytic weight gain varies between patients in groups with different cognitive profiles. Background. Theory‐based research suggests that cognitive factors (e.g. self‐efficacy and attentional style) and depressive symptomatology undermine adherence to health protective regimens. Preventing negative outcomes of fluid overload is essential for haemodialysis patients but many patients cannot achieve fluid control, and nursing interventions aimed to help the patients reduce fluid intake are ineffective. Understanding the interaction between cognitive factors and how this is related to adherence outcomes might therefore lead to the development of helpful nursing interventions. Design. Explorative cross‐sectional multicentre survey. Methods. The sample consisted of 133 haemodialysis patients. Data were collected using structured questionnaires. A brief self‐report form and data on interdialytic weight gain was also used. Two‐step cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups. One‐way analysis of variance (anova) or Pearson’s chi‐square test was used for comparing subgroups. Results. Three distinct subgroups were found and subsequently labelled: (1) low self‐efficacy, (2) distraction and depressive symptoms and (3) high self‐efficacy. The subgroups differed in fluid intake, but not in age, dialysis vintage, gender, residual urine output or in receiving any fluid intake advice. Conclusions. Clinically relevant subgroups of haemodialysis patients could be defined by their profiles regarding self‐efficacy, attentional style and depressive symptoms. Relevance to clinical practice. Based on this study, we would encourage clinical practitioners to take into account cognitive profiles while performing their work. This is especially important when a targeted nursing intervention, which aims to encourage and maintain the patient’s fluid control, is introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Magnus Lindberg & Björn Wikström & Per Lindberg, 2010. "Subgroups of haemodialysis patients in relation to fluid intake restrictions: a cluster analytical approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 2997-3005, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:2997-3005
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03372.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03372.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03372.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sisook Kim & Hyunsook Zin Lee & Eunhye Hwang & Juhyun Song & Hye‐Jin Kwon & Kwisoon Choe, 2016. "Lived experience of Korean nurses caring for patients on maintenance haemodialysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1455-1463, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:2997-3005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.