IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i19-20p2771-2776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Haemorrhoidectomy: prevalence and risk factors of urine retention among post recipients

Author

Listed:
  • Yu‐Hua Lin
  • Kuang‐Wen Liu
  • Hsin‐Pao Chen

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence and risk factors of urine retention among posthaemorrhoidectomy recipients. Background. Haemorrhoids are one of the most common functional disorders of the anus. The Haemorrhoidectomy surgical procedure is one of the primary treatments for more severe haemorrhoidal occurrences, such as for third‐ and/or fourth‐degree haemorrhoid conditions. Urine retention is a common acute complication after operation, but rare study conducted by nurses in Taiwan to explore the prevalence and risk factors. Design. A retrospective chart review was conducted. Methods. Data from a prospectively maintained database on patients who had undergone haemorrhoidectomy between April 2004 – August 2008 were retrospectively analysed. A total of 469 charts were used in this analysis. The following outcomes were studied: patient profiles, haemorrhoid type and severity, anaesthesia methods, length of operating room stay, urine retention and management, intravenous fluid given during operation and length of stay. Results. The overall urinary retention rate was 32·8% (n = 153). Significant risk factors associated with postoperative urinary retention included severity of haemorrhoid and anaesthesia methods. Logistic regression analysis revealed that epidural anaesthesia (p = 0·008), spinal anaesthesia (p = 0·016) and haemorrhoids with a severity of three degrees or higher (p = 0·017) were predictors of urinary retention post haemorrhoidectomy. Conclusions. Acute urinary retention can have an adverse effect on a patient’s quality of care. Careful follow‐up of patients with these risk factors can help nurses spot posthaemorrhoidectomy urinary retention early. Relevance to clinical practice. The prevalence of acute urinary retention post haemorrhoidectomy is common. Surgical ward nurses should therefore take the responsibility regarding the impact of urinary retention and seeking appropriate nursing interventions of induced urination.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu‐Hua Lin & Kuang‐Wen Liu & Hsin‐Pao Chen, 2010. "Haemorrhoidectomy: prevalence and risk factors of urine retention among post recipients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2771-2776, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:19-20:p:2771-2776
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03178.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03178.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03178.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:19-20:p:2771-2776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.