Author
Listed:
- David Edvardsson
- Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh
- Rhonda Nay
Abstract
Aims and objectives. This article aims to describe the content of person‐centred care as described by people with dementia, family members and staff in residential aged care. Background. Person‐centred care is increasingly being regarded as synonymous with best quality aged care; however, studies exploring stakeholders’ experiences of person‐centred care are few. Design. A qualitative explorative design was employed using conversational research interviews and content analysis. Method. Research interviews were conducted in 2007 and 2008 with staff working in aged care (n = 37), people with early onset dementia (n = 11), and family members of patients with dementia (n = 19) and were analysed using content analysis. Results. The findings indicated that the core category of person‐centred care was promoting a continuation of self and normality. Five content categories emerged as contributing to promoting a continuation of self and normality: knowing the person; welcoming family; providing meaningful activities; being in a personalised environment; and experiencing flexibility and continuity. Conclusions. This study describes person‐centred care as it is understood by people with dementia, their family members and staff in residential aged care, and as such it contributes with inside perspectives to current understandings of person‐centred care, perspectives that have been largely lacking. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings of this study are clinically relevant and ready to be operationalised and applied in clinical aged care. The categories can be used as a topic guide for discussions in aged care organisations on the quality of current care and as elements indicating how to increase the person‐centredness of care provided.
Suggested Citation
David Edvardsson & Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh & Rhonda Nay, 2010.
"Promoting a continuation of self and normality: person‐centred care as described by people with dementia, their family members and aged care staff,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2611-2618, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2611-2618
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03143.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2611-2618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.