IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i17-18p2481-2492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A structured observation of the interaction between nurses and patients during the administration of medication in an acute mental health unit

Author

Listed:
  • Joy A Duxbury
  • Karen Margaret Wright
  • Anna Hart
  • Diane Bradley
  • Pamela Roach
  • Neil Harris
  • Bernie Carter

Abstract

Aims. This aims of this study are to describe current practice in the administration of medication in an acute psychiatric unit and explore factors that influence nurses’ decisions regarding the administration of medication during ‘rounds’. Background. Medication ‘rounds’ form part of the ward routine in many inpatient mental health settings. Nurses make several clinical decisions about administrating medication; yet, concerns have been raised about the poor assessment of patients’ needs and the quality of the information exchanged. Design. A structured non‐participant observational design was used for this research. Method. This study involved the observation of 20 medication ‘rounds’ over three months. The Ward Administration of Medication Schedule was used to report on the interactions between nurses and patients and aspects of their communication during each round. Results. From the rounds observed nurses appeared adept at communicating a positive interpersonal style but less so in demonstrating skills portraying collaboration and information giving. For example whilst nurses communicated warmth in 97% of cases, using non‐verbal behaviours such as good eye contact, the provision of information was only initiated in 46% of cases. Enquiries regarding the patient’s general health and medication taking (35% and 17% respectively) were less commonly observed. Verbal consent was sought in only 25% of cases. Procedural matters were adhered to overall. Conclusions. Findings suggest limited collaboration between nurses and patients and the poor monitoring of health status and medication effects. Information exchange could be improved; however, this may be related to medication procedures that make it difficult to explore sensitive information with patients, rather than nursing skills and behaviour. Relevance to clinical practice. The Ward Administration of Medication Schedule can be used as a clinical or educational tool in the administration of medication. In both instances, it may be self‐administered and used to reflect on personal skills or employed as an observational tool during peer review and audit.

Suggested Citation

  • Joy A Duxbury & Karen Margaret Wright & Anna Hart & Diane Bradley & Pamela Roach & Neil Harris & Bernie Carter, 2010. "A structured observation of the interaction between nurses and patients during the administration of medication in an acute mental health unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2481-2492, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2481-2492
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03291.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03291.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03291.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chewning, Betty & Sleath, Betsy, 1996. "Medication decision-making and management: A client-centered model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 389-398, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tineke Schoot & Ireen Proot & Marja Legius & Ruud ter Meulen & Luc de Witte, 2006. "Client-Centered Home Care," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 15(4), pages 231-254, November.
    2. Mary K. Anthony & Diane Hudson-Barr, 2004. "A Patient-Centered Model of Care for Hospital Discharge," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 13(2), pages 117-136, May.
    3. Denis Klimanov & Ekaterina Frolkina, 2015. "The Impact of CRM System Use on Companies’ Customer Understanding: The Case of the Russian Ophthalmology Market," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 27(1), pages 75-92.
    4. Young-Sun Lee & Jeffrey Douglas & Betty Chewning, 2007. "Techniques For Developing Health Quality of Life Scales for Point of Service Use," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 83(2), pages 331-350, September.
    5. Tineke Schoot & Ireen Proot & Ruud Ter Meulen & Luc de Witte, 2005. "Actual Interaction and Client Centeredness in Home Care," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 14(4), pages 370-393, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2481-2492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.