Author
Listed:
- Adriana De Souza Caroci
- Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco
- Wesllanny Da Silva Sousa
- Ana Carolina Cotrim
- Edinéia Maria Sena
- Nelly Lima Rocha
- Cintia Najara Caroci Fontes
Abstract
Aim. To compare the measurements of women’s pelvic floor musculature strength (PFMS) during pregnancy and postpartum period. Background. Pregnancy and childbirth can have an influence on the muscles and pelvic floor and can cause morbidities of women’s genito‐urinary tract. Design. A prospective cohort study. Methods. There were included 226 primigravidae women, attended by community health services in the city of Itapecerica da Serra, Sao Paulo, Brazil. The participants were followed in four stages: (1) within 12 weeks of pregnancy; (2) between 36–40 weeks of pregnancy; (3) within 48 hours after childbirth; (4) 42‐60 days after childbirth. Data were collected from February 2007–August 2008. The pelvic floor musculature strength was evaluated by perineometry and digital vaginal palpation in stages 1, 2 and 4. The final sample included 110 women who completed all four stages of the study. Results. The pelvic floor musculature strength of the women did not change significantly during pregnancy or after delivery (anova: p = 0·78). In all three examined stages, a low‐intensity pelvic floor musculature strength was prevalent (in mmHg: stage 1 = 15·9; stage 2 = 15·2, stage 4 = 14·7), with scores from 0–3 on the Oxford scale. The pelvic floor musculature strength did not differ in relation to maternal age, skin colour, conjugal status, dyspareunia, stool characteristics, type of delivery, or conditions of the perineum. An interaction between maternal nutritional state and newborn’s weight may affect the pelvic floor musculature strength (manova: p = 0·04). Conclusion. Pregnancy and childbirth did not reduce significantly pelvic floor musculature strength. The perineometry and digital vaginal palpation used to assess the pelvic floor musculature strength were well accepted by the women. Relevance to clinical practice. In clinical practice, digital vaginal palpation is effective for supporting the diagnosis of urinary, intestinal and sexual dysfunctions. Perineometry use is particularly important together with the performance of perineal exercises with biofeedback in the treatment these disorders.
Suggested Citation
Adriana De Souza Caroci & Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco & Wesllanny Da Silva Sousa & Ana Carolina Cotrim & Edinéia Maria Sena & Nelly Lima Rocha & Cintia Najara Caroci Fontes, 2010.
"Analysis of pelvic floor musculature function during pregnancy and postpartum: a cohort study,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2424-2433, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2424-2433
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03289.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2424-2433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.