IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i17-18p2377-2393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Literature review: should antipyretic therapies routinely be administered to patient fever?

Author

Listed:
  • Jane V Carey

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To determine whether the practices of routinely treating fever with antipyretic medications or physical cooling methods are supported by the literature. Background. Fever is one of the commonest symptoms presented to caregivers. Previous research suggests that treating fever with antipyretic medications or physical cooling methods is often routine practice. This article considers that fever and the febrile response may have been preserved through evolution because of its advantage for host defences and that fever may have an adaptive value. It is questioned whether the administration of antipyretic therapies could prolong the duration of illness, as interventions to lower body temperature are acting against the body’s natural response to infection. Design. Literature review. Method. Electronic databases and the Internet were searched, supplemented by citation tracking. Articles were eligible if the participants studied had received pharmacological or physical cooling interventions to reduce their body temperature during fever. The interventions were evaluated in regard to whether they prolonged duration of illness. Results. Results were inconsistent. None of the studies found that antipyretic therapies reduced duration of illness in patients with fever. Evidence suggests that antipyretic therapies do not reduce the duration of illness, but can prolong it. Conclusions. The evidence on which to base recommendations for practice is weak but does not support the current practice of administering antipyretic therapies routinely to patients with fever. Physical cooling methods alone should never be used. Nurses should assess patients with fever on an individualised basis and use antipyretic therapies selectively. Relevance to clinical practice. The administration of antipyretics to patients with fever is an important issue, and nurses are at the forefront of decision‐making. Evidence‐based care delivery is expected by the NMC. A protocol to assist decision‐making when caring for patients with pyrexia is suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane V Carey, 2010. "Literature review: should antipyretic therapies routinely be administered to patient fever?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2377-2393, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2377-2393
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03258.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03258.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03258.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Panagiotis Kiekkas & Evangelos Konstantinou & Kalliopi‐Styliani Psychogiou & Iliana Tsampoula & Nikolaos Stefanopoulos & Nick Bakalis, 2014. "Nursing personnel's attitudes towards fever and antipyresis of adult patients: cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2949-2957, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:17-18:p:2377-2393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.