IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i15-16p2300-2308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To what extent does the oral shift report stimulate learning among nursing students? A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Mari W Skaalvik
  • Hans K Normann
  • Nils Henriksen

Abstract

Aim and objective. The aim of this study was to describe oral shift reporting and to discuss whether it stimulates learning for nursing students in clinical rotations in nursing homes. The goal was to investigate aspects that are important for oral shift report to be instructive for nursing students. Background. Nursing students’ clinical learning experiences are important components of their professional development. Oral shift reporting serves several purposes and provides an opportunity for professional communication that supports both educational and social functions for nursing students during clinical practice. Design. A qualitative study. Methods. The study features both field work with field notes and qualitative research interviews was conducted in 2006. Twelve third‐year nursing students and their supervising nurses (n = 11) participated in the study. Results. The nursing students described a range of experiences with oral shift reports. Some perceived little educational benefit from the oral shift reports, while others felt that both the form and the content of the oral shift reports were useful. The students’ experiences corroborated the statements provided by the supervising nurses in the nursing homes. Conclusions. We conclude that oral shift reporting may be an important learning opportunity. This is especially true when nursing students engage in professional discussions with their colleagues and superiors. Our findings suggest solutions to improve the learning value of the oral shift reporting process for nursing students. Relevance to clinical practice. Oral shift reporting can stimulate learning if it includes consultation and discussion between nursing students and the nursing staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Mari W Skaalvik & Hans K Normann & Nils Henriksen, 2010. "To what extent does the oral shift report stimulate learning among nursing students? A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2300-2308, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2300-2308
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03217.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03217.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03217.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Marie Lunde Husebø & Marianne Storm & Bodil Bø Våga & Adriana Rosenberg & Kristin Akerjordet, 2018. "Status of knowledge on student‐learning environments in nursing homes: A mixed‐method systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1344-1359, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2300-2308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.