IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i15-16p2291-2299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Investing in the future’: residential aged care staff experiences of working with nursing students in a ‘community of practice’

Author

Listed:
  • Laurie Grealish
  • Kasia Bail
  • Kristen Ranse

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This paper aims to discuss the implementation of a ‘community of practice’ model of clinical teaching into four residential aged care facilities. Background. There is increasing international evidence that aged care is a burgeoning health issue, particularly in developed countries. Recruitment and retention of nurses is problematic in residential aged care. Nursing students maintain negative perceptions of aged care and dislike clinical placements in that area. Additionally, supporting students in residential aged care is difficult considering the staffing mix of skilled/unskilled staff. Innovative educational strategies are needed to manage the increasing shortages of clinical placements for nursing students in all clinical areas. Study design. Staff experiences were elicited through four focus groups onsite at the residential aged care facility where students had been placed, one year after implementation of a ‘communities of practice’ clinical model. Data analysis used a qualitative, thematic approach. Results. The staff in the residential aged care facilities expressed that work was involved in supporting students in the workplace, but that the additional workload was a valuable investment. Conclusions. Staff in residential aged care see working with students as a local investment, where students’ fresh eyes, recent knowledge and questioning behaviours are a worthy investment of staff time and effort. Staff also valued the investment in the future, where working with students now creates future nurses sensitive to aged care issues. Relevance to clinical practice. In a ‘communities of practice’ model of clinical experience for students, there are benefits for staff as well as students. The implementation of this clinical model in residential aged care was relatively low in cost, a benefit in this sector and has the potential to address the critical issues of recruitment and retention.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurie Grealish & Kasia Bail & Kristen Ranse, 2010. "‘Investing in the future’: residential aged care staff experiences of working with nursing students in a ‘community of practice’," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2291-2299, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2291-2299
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03133.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03133.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03133.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emma Lea & Ron Mason & Claire Eccleston & Andrew Robinson, 2016. "Aspects of nursing student placements associated with perceived likelihood of working in residential aged care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 715-724, March.
    2. Laurie Grealish & Amanda Henderson & Fritz Quero & Roslyn Phillips & May Surawski, 2015. "The significance of ‘facilitator as a change agent’ – organisational learning culture in aged care home settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 961-969, April.
    3. Anne Marie Lunde Husebø & Marianne Storm & Bodil Bø Våga & Adriana Rosenberg & Kristin Akerjordet, 2018. "Status of knowledge on student‐learning environments in nursing homes: A mixed‐method systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1344-1359, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2291-2299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.