IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i15-16p2152-2161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The lived experience of persons with lower extremity amputation

Author

Listed:
  • Fen Liu
  • Rhonda M Williams
  • Hsueh‐Erh Liu
  • Nai‐Hui Chien

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was to describe and understand the lived experience of people with lower extremity amputation. Background. The loss of a body part can cause physical, psychological and social disturbances. The majority of previous studies in this area focus on the impact of amputation or the effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes. This is the first study in Taiwan exploring the holistic experiences of persons with amputation. Design. A phenomenological research design was used. Methods. Semi‐structured interviews were performed with 22 people with lower extremity amputation. Interviews were tape‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Colaizzi’s phenomenological analysis method. Results. The lived experience of persons with lower extremity amputation could be categorised into the following four themes: ‘lost in the dark woods’, ‘emotional collapse’, ‘difficulty in passing through the shadow’ and ‘igniting a gleam of hope’. Conclusions. Participants described suffering in physical, psychological and sociocultural realms and the ways they strived to cope with these challenges. The findings of this study provide an enhanced understanding of the experiences of people with lower extremity amputation and underscore the importance of truly listening and responding to their concerns. The need to appreciate cultural context and to develop the peer‐based support programme was highlighted. Relevance to clinical practice. Health professionals need to acknowledge the real needs of people with lower extremity amputation and provide them a clear explanation regarding the short‐term and long‐term health issues associated with amputation during the pre‐ and post‐amputation phase. Health professionals also need to expand the scope of services beyond a physical and prosthetic focus. Supportive psychological and social interventions such as formal support groups and peer support programmes may provide a powerful and inexpensive addition to routine care. Currently, such programmes are unavailable in Taiwan.

Suggested Citation

  • Fen Liu & Rhonda M Williams & Hsueh‐Erh Liu & Nai‐Hui Chien, 2010. "The lived experience of persons with lower extremity amputation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2152-2161, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2152-2161
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03256.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03256.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03256.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan Monaro & Sandra West & Janice Gullick, 2020. "The body with chronic limb‐threatening ischaemia: A phenomenologically derived understanding," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1276-1289, April.
    2. Annelise Norlyk & Bente Martinsen & Elisabeth Hall & Anita Haahr, 2016. "Being In-Between," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2152-2161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.