Author
Listed:
- Anncarin Svanberg
- Kerstin Öhrn
- Gunnar Birgegård
Abstract
Aim and objective. To investigate if oral cryotherapy during myeloablative therapy may influence frequency and severity of mucositis, nutritional status and infection rate after bone marrow transplantation. Background. Patients treated with intensive myeloablative treatment before bone marrow transplantation are all at risk to develop mucositis. Oral mucositis causes severe pain and oral dysfunction, which can contribute to local and systemic infections and bleeding; it may even interrupt cancer therapy. Oral mucositis also decreases the oral food intake, which increases the risk for malnutrition and infection. Reduced food intake, loss of fat and muscles, alterations in energy and substrate metabolism leads to malnutrition. Design. A randomised controlled trial with a random assignment to experimental or control group. Method. A stratified randomisation was used with regard to the type of transplantation. Mucositis was measured on WHO mucositis scale. Number of days of total parenteral nutrition, infection rate, weight, albumin levels and days at hospital was compared. Results. There were significantly fewer patients in the experimental group with mucositis grade 3–4 than in the control group and significantly lower number of days in the hospital (allogeneic patients). Less total parenteral nutrition was needed in the experimental group in both settings, and the S‐albumin level was significantly better preserved. No significant difference could be found with regard to infection rate. Conclusion. Oral cryotherapy reduced mucositis, number of hospital days, the need for total parenteral nutrition and resulted in a better nutritional status. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses caring for patients treated with myeloablative therapy should place high priority to prevent oral mucositis and hereby reduce its side effects.
Suggested Citation
Anncarin Svanberg & Kerstin Öhrn & Gunnar Birgegård, 2010.
"Oral cryotherapy reduces mucositis and improves nutrition – a randomised controlled trial,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2146-2151, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2146-2151
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03255.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2146-2151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.