IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i13-14p2004-2013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recovering from a stroke: a longitudinal, qualitative study of older Norwegian women

Author

Listed:
  • Grethe Eilertsen
  • Marit Kirkevold
  • Ida Torunn Bjørk

Abstract

Aim. To illuminate older women’s experiences and the characteristics of the recovery process following a stroke. Background. Patients with stroke face serious challenges related to bodily changes, existential aspects and daily life after stroke. Few qualitative longitudinal studies have examined the recovery process from the perspective of the patient. Knowledge about older women’s experiences in coping with life after a stroke is limited. Design. Prospective, longitudinal, case‐study design. Methods. Six women aged 68–83 suffering from first‐time stroke were recruited from two stroke units. Each participant was interviewed in‐depth 12–14 times during the first two years post stroke. The interviews addressed how they experienced their body, their self‐understanding, daily life and how this had changed over time. Most interviews took place in the participants’ homes. Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics informed the analyses. Results. Post stroke recovery was slow and complex and evolved through four distinct phases. In the first phase (0–2 months post stroke), the participants’ main concerns were their bodily changes; in the second phase (2–6 months), activities of daily life; in the third phase (6–12 months), self‐understanding and in the fourth phase (12–24 months), going on with life. The transition between phases was gradual. Conclusion. Recovery from stroke evolves over time through four distinct phases, which differ depending on significant experiences and associated meanings. Psychological and social resources are equally critical in the women’s process of recovery. Relevance to clinical practice. The four phases of rehabilitation suggest at what points various concerns require increased therapeutic attention. Psychological and social resources must be vitalised at an early phase similar to bodily resources. This knowledge may assist professionals in offering adequate help throughout the recovery process even beyond the established rehabilitation period.

Suggested Citation

  • Grethe Eilertsen & Marit Kirkevold & Ida Torunn Bjørk, 2010. "Recovering from a stroke: a longitudinal, qualitative study of older Norwegian women," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(13‐14), pages 2004-2013, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:2004-2013
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03138.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03138.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03138.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Birgit Brunborg & Siri Ytrehus, 2014. "Sense of well‐being 10 years after stroke," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1055-1063, April.
    2. Meijering, Louise & Theunissen, Nicky & Lettinga, Ant T., 2019. "Re-engaging with places: Understanding bio-geo-graphical disruption and flow in adult brain injury survivors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 22-30.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:2004-2013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.