Author
Listed:
- Hannah G Dahlen
- Lesley M Barclay
- Caroline SE Homer
Abstract
Aims and objectives. To explore first‐time mothers’ experiences of birth at home and in hospital in Australia. Background. The first birth has unique physical and psychological impacts on women. With the first birth, women become mothers. Design. A grounded theory methodology was used. Data were generated from in‐depth interviews with women in their own homes. Methods. Nineteen women were interviewed in Sydney, Australia. The experiences of seven women who gave birth for the first time in a public hospital and seven women who gave birth for the first time at home were contrasted with two mothers who gave birth for the first time in birth centres, one mother who gave birth for the first time in a private hospital and two women who had given birth more than once. Results. Following the birth, women ‘processed the birth’ by ‘remembering’, ‘talking (storytelling)’ and ‘feeling’. This activity appeared to help most women resolve their feelings about the birth and understand what it actually means to be a new mother. ‘Personal and social integration’ occurred for most women as they entered ‘motherland’. Conclusion. First‐time mothers appear to ‘process the birth’ to a greater extent than multiparous women because they are experiencing this for the first time. These women also have limited social networks in ‘motherland’, and these are facilitated through sharing the experiences of their labour or ‘processing the birth’. Relevance to clinical practice. Identifying the novice status of first‐time mothers and understanding the way they process the birth can help health providers to be sensitive to the specific needs of primiparous women. In particular, their need to tell their birth stories following birth; understanding that these stories help women to process the birth and connect to other women.
Suggested Citation
Hannah G Dahlen & Lesley M Barclay & Caroline SE Homer, 2010.
"Processing the first birth: journeying into ‘motherland’,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(13‐14), pages 1977-1985, July.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1977-1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03089.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1977-1985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.