IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i13-14p1908-1918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to research utilisation by staff nurses in a university hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Gulseren Kocaman
  • Seyda Seren
  • Ayhan A Lash
  • Seyyare Kurt
  • Nergiz Bengu
  • Havva A Yurumezoglu

Abstract

Aim. To identify self‐reported perceptions of the barriers to research utilisation by Turkish staff nurses working in a university hospital and to ascertain whether involvement in research‐related activities influenced their perception of the barriers. Background. Research utilisation in nursing has been a prominent concern for the last 30 years. While investigators in several countries have identified nurses’ perception of barriers to research utilisation, this is the first study to investigate such barriers in Turkey. Design. This is a descriptive, cross sectional study with a sample of 329 staff nurses working in a university hospital. Two instruments were used; a demographics questionnaire that investigated research activities and the Barriers Scale to measure perceptions. An additional item, ‘studies are published in English’ was added to the scale. Results. The lack of time to implement new ideas was the most frequently, 84·5%, perceived barrier. The second most frequently perceived barrier was difficulty in reading English. The top six barriers were all related to the setting. Additionally, research‐active nurses found insufficient time less of a barrier but unawareness of research findings and being isolated from knowledgeable colleagues as greater barriers to research utilisation. Conclusions. Turkish nurses’ perception of barriers is similar to the findings in other countries, i.e., that the top six barriers were related to setting. Language barrier compares similarly with studies in other countries that investigated this variable. Relevance to clinical practice. The gap between theory and practice in nursing can be minimised by identifying strategies to increase research utilisation in clinical settings. Such strategies can also improve patient care outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Gulseren Kocaman & Seyda Seren & Ayhan A Lash & Seyyare Kurt & Nergiz Bengu & Havva A Yurumezoglu, 2010. "Barriers to research utilisation by staff nurses in a university hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(13‐14), pages 1908-1918, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1908-1918
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03032.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03032.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03032.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Havva Arslan Yurumezoglu & Gulseren Kocaman, 2012. "Pilot study for evidence‐based nursing management: Improving the levels of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intent to leave among nurses in Turkey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 221-228, June.
    2. Andrea M. Yevchak & Donna M. Fick & Jane McDowell & Todd Monroe & Kanah May & Lori Grove & Ann M. Kolanowski & Jennifer L. Waller & Sharon K. Inouye, 2014. "Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Delirium Rounds in a Clinical Trial Across Three Diverse Hospital Settings," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 23(2), pages 201-215, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1908-1918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.