IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i13-14p1795-1802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of risk factors and DXA T score among at‐risk females of osteoporosis

Author

Listed:
  • Shu F Chang
  • Rong S Yang
  • Ue L Chung
  • Chia M Chen
  • Mei H Cheng

Abstract

Aim. This paper reports a study to investigate the relationships among bone mineral density, demographics, knowledge of osteoporosis, beliefs concerning osteoporosis and preventive behaviours of at‐risk females with family histories of osteoporosis. Background. Strong evidence demonstrates that genetics is a significant determinant of peak bone mass, with a heritability of 50–90%. However, few studies have examined the bone mineral density of at‐risk females with family histories of osteoporosis, particularly in an Asian population. Design. Telephone survey. Methods. The study population (n = 2890) was recruited from a radiology department at a national university medical centre in northern Taiwan during 2005–2006. In total, 886 females completed a questionnaire via the telephone; the participation rate was 30·7%. Results. The bone mineral density of at‐risk females was close to osteopenia status (T score of −1 to −2·49). Most subjects were aware of osteoporosis‐related information; however, few clearly understood osteoporosis. Furthermore, subjects reported difficult implementing strategies to improve bone mineral density. Variation in bone mineral density was correlated with self‐rated health (r = 0·56, p

Suggested Citation

  • Shu F Chang & Rong S Yang & Ue L Chung & Chia M Chen & Mei H Cheng, 2010. "Perception of risk factors and DXA T score among at‐risk females of osteoporosis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(13‐14), pages 1795-1802, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1795-1802
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03063.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03063.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03063.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1795-1802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.