IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i11-12p1748-1760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Womens’ opinions on intrapartal care: development of a theory‐based questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Bodil Wilde‐Larsson
  • Gerry Larsson
  • Linda J Kvist
  • Ann‐Kristin Sandin‐Bojö

Abstract

Aim. To develop a patient questionnaire specific to intrapartal care, based on the theoretical foundation of the general instrument Quality from the Patient’s Perspective (QPP). Background. Existing general patient questionnaires do not take intrapartal care aspects fully into account, and available intrapartal‐specific patient questionnaires tend to have a weak theoretical foundation. Design. A cross‐sectional, nationwide study carried out during a two‐week period in 2007 at Swedish maternity units. Method. An intrapartal‐specific QPP‐questionnaire (QPP‐I) was developed by combining a selection of 22 items from the short and long versions of the QPP with 10 newly constructed items. Responses were obtained from 739 women (63% response rate). The dimensionality of the QPP‐I was assessed using structural equation modelling (a nested factor model). Non‐parametric statistics were used for subgroup comparisons. Results. A nested model with a general factor including all 32 items and 10 subordinate factors was developed. Most scales had acceptable reliability coefficients (0·73–0·93), and a meaningful pattern of subgroup differences was obtained. Conclusions. The QPP‐I is theory based and has its roots in a patient perspective. It was developed using a nationwide sample of Swedish women receiving intrapartal care, and an advanced statistical method was used. The outcome of this initial empirical trial was promising but needs to be tested in different countries and cultures. Relevance to clinical practice. By combining womens’ responses on perceived reality and subjective importance ascribed to the various aspects of care measured, the QPP‐I offers the care provider better guidelines on which elements to focus quality improvement work on, than would be the case if only a rank order of perceived reality ratings was available.

Suggested Citation

  • Bodil Wilde‐Larsson & Gerry Larsson & Linda J Kvist & Ann‐Kristin Sandin‐Bojö, 2010. "Womens’ opinions on intrapartal care: development of a theory‐based questionnaire," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1748-1760, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1748-1760
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03055.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03055.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03055.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1748-1760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.