IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i1-2p240-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ perception of the use of computerised information systems in practice: questionnaire development

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Oroviogoicoechea
  • Roger Watson
  • Elena Beortegui
  • Silvia Remirez

Abstract

Aim. To develop and validate a questionnaire to explore the perceptions of nurses about the implementation of a computerised information system in clinical practice. Background. A growing interest in understanding nurses’ experience of developing and implementing clinically relevant Information Technology systems and the lack of measurement tools in this area, justifies further research into the development of instruments to provide an insight into nurses’ experience. Design. Survey and questionnaire development. Method. An initial draft of the questionnaire was developed based on the literature and expert opinion. The questionnaire was piloted by ten nurses to check face validity, reliability and test‐retest reliability. A revised version of the questionnaire was distributed to nurses working in the in‐patient area of a university hospital in Spain (n = 227). Principal components analysis with oblique rotation was carried out to test theoretically developed underlying dimensions and to test construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to determine internal consistency. Results. Cronbach’s alpha for all the items included in the different scales was 0·88 in the pilot questionnaire and test‐retest reliability was adequate. Principal components analysis of items related to mechanisms produced a three‐component structure (‘IT support’, ‘usability’ and ‘information characteristics’). The three factors explained 48·6% of the total variance and Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0·66–0·79. Principal components analysis of items related to outcomes produced a three factor solution (‘impact on patient care’, ‘impact on communication’ and ‘image profile’). The factors explained 65·9% of the total variance and Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0·64–0·85. Conclusion. The study provides a detailed description and justification of an instrument development process. The instrument is valid and reliable for the setting where it has been used. Relevance to clinical practice. The instrument could provide insight into nurses’ experience of IT implementation that will guide further development of systems to enhance clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Oroviogoicoechea & Roger Watson & Elena Beortegui & Silvia Remirez, 2010. "Nurses’ perception of the use of computerised information systems in practice: questionnaire development," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 240-248, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:1-2:p:240-248
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03003.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03003.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03003.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:1-2:p:240-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.