IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i1-2p118-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain assessment and management practices in children following surgery of the lower limb

Author

Listed:
  • Jaga Maya Shrestha‐Ranjit
  • Elizabeth Manias

Abstract

Aims. To examine paediatric nurses’ pain assessment and management practices in relation to postoperative care for children following surgery of a fractured lower limb and to compare these practices with evidence‐based guidelines. Background. Managing pain is one of the most challenging issues in current paediatric practice. The incidence of lower limb fractures is high in children, which often leads to pain and related complications in the postoperative period. Design. A retrospective clinical audit study. Methods. A retrospective audit of all medical records (n = 106) was undertaken over two years of children aged 5–15 years who were admitted for surgical procedure for a fractured lower limb. An audit tool was developed to collect data related to children’s postoperative pain assessment and management on the day of operation to the third postoperative day. The study was undertaken in a tertiary paediatric hospital in Australia. Results. The retrospective audit revealed that assessment and management of children’s postoperative pain was inadequate. On average, 75% of children experienced some degree of pain; 50% had moderate to severe pain. Nurses assessed pain less frequently compared to the number of times they were expected to assess pain postoperatively. Most analgesics were prescribed on an ‘as needed’ basis and patients received significantly lower amounts of analgesics than prescribed amounts. Conclusion. The clinical audit revealed that addressing children’s postoperative analgesic needs was not consistent with evidence‐based guidelines. Relevance to clinical practice. While this study was undertaken in only one hospital, the results are likely to be applicable to other children’s hospital settings. Nurses need to be proactive in promoting effective assessment and management of pain in children. The results of this study provide a useful guide for planning and implementing future strategies to improve postoperative pain management in children.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaga Maya Shrestha‐Ranjit & Elizabeth Manias, 2010. "Pain assessment and management practices in children following surgery of the lower limb," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 118-128, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:1-2:p:118-128
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03068.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03068.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03068.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jackie Vasey & Joanna Smith & Marilynne N. Kirshbaum & Kathleen Chirema, 2019. "Tokenism or true partnership: Parental involvement in a child’s acute pain care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1491-1505, May.
    2. Lucyna Tomaszek & Grażyna Dębska, 2018. "Knowledge, compliance with good clinical practices and barriers to effective control of postoperative pain among nurses from hospitals with and without a “Hospital without Pain” certificate," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1641-1652, April.
    3. Karin Plummer & Maria McCarthy & Ian McKenzie & Fiona Newall & Elizabeth Manias, 2017. "Pain assessment and management in paediatric oncology: a cross‐sectional audit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2995-3006, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:1-2:p:118-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.