IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i4p459-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of nurses’ inferences of patients’ physical pain

Author

Listed:
  • Benita Wilson
  • Wilfred McSherry

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was to establish if postregistration education and clinical experience influence nurses’ inferences of patients’ physical pain. Background. Pain is a complex, subjective phenomenon making it an experience that is elusive and difficult to define. Evaluation of an individual's pain is the product of a dynamic, interactive process that frequently results in ineffective pain management. Educating nurses should address the deficit, however the clinical environment is thought to be most influential in the acquisition of knowledge. Design. A series of vignettes was used to consider nurses’ inferences of physical pain for six hypothetical patients; these were employed within a self‐administered questionnaire that also addressed lifestyle factors of patients in pain, general attitudes and beliefs about pain management and general knowledge of pain control. Method. One hundred questionnaires were distributed; 86 nurses returned the questionnaire giving a response rate of 86%. Following selection of the sample 72 nurses participated in the study: 35 hospice/oncology nurses (specialist) and 37 district nurses (general). Data analysis was carried out using SPSS and qualitative analysis of the written responses. Results. The specialist nurses tended to infer lower levels of physical pain than the general nurses when considering the patients in the vignettes. Conclusion. Education and clinical experience influence nurses’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about pain. However, it would appear that the specialist nurses’ working environment and knowledge base engenders a practice theory divide, resulting in desensitization to patients’ physical pain. Relevance to clinical practice. It is suggested that the specialist nurses use defence mechanisms to protect them from the conflict that arises from working within the clinical environment. These cognitive strategies have the potential to ease cognitive dissonance for the nurse, but may increase patient suffering.

Suggested Citation

  • Benita Wilson & Wilfred McSherry, 2006. "A study of nurses’ inferences of patients’ physical pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 459-468, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:459-468
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01358.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01358.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01358.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:459-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.