Author
Listed:
- Mevlüde Karadag
- Necla Gümüskaya
Abstract
Aim. This research was conducted for the purpose of determining the incidence of surgery‐related pressure ulcer formation. Background. Patients undergoing surgery are prone to develop pressure ulcers during surgery. Pressure ulcer incidence in surgery population is reported between 3·5% and 29·5%. Some of these factors that occur during surgery are being under pressure for a long time, remaining wet, and metabolic and circulatory changes related to the surgery and anaesthesia. Design. The research was conducted as a prospective‐analytic‐descriptive study with 84 patients who agreed to participate in the study and who were 20 years old or older, having elective surgery, having a surgical procedure lasting two or more hours under general anaesthesia, and who had no risk for pressure ulcer development before surgery according to the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale. Research data were obtained using a Data Collection Form that has places for pre‐, intra‐ and postoperative factors that may be related to surgery‐related pressure ulcer development; a Body Mass Index Data Form and the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale. The Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale was used to determine that patients had no risk for pressure ulcer development pre‐ and postoperatively and it was used for the purpose of establishing the patients risk status and areas at risk. Patients were monitored for pressure ulcers until the sixth postoperative day and risk status and areas at risk were determined. Data obtained in the research were analysed using percentage, chi‐squared, McNemar and Cohen's Kappa tests for reliability between dependent groups. Results. At the conclusion of the research, the findings obtained showed that 54·8% of the patients (n = 46) were observed to have Stage 1 pressure ulcers. A total of 41·3% of the patients had pressure ulcers in more than one region and 56·5% of these were of the erythema type. During the six‐day postoperative monitoring, 97·9% of the pressure ulcers were observed in the first three days. Conclusion. The study made clear that surgery‐related pressure ulcers are an important problem. Relevance to clinical practice. (i) Determining the incidence of pressure ulcers during surgery in Turkey; (ii) For nurses to be able to prevent surgery‐related pressure ulcers, it is necessary for them to direct their care by knowing factors that have a role in the development of pressure ulcers during surgery therefore this study will be to call Turkish nurse's attention to pressure ulcers during surgery.
Suggested Citation
Mevlüde Karadag & Necla Gümüskaya, 2006.
"The incidence of pressure ulcers in surgical patients: a sample hospital in Turkey,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 413-421, April.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:413-421
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01369.x
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Ivan Mwebaza & Godfrey Katende & Sara Groves & Joyce Nankumbi, 2014.
"Nurses’ Knowledge, Practices, and Barriers in Care of Patients with Pressure Ulcers in a Ugandan Teaching Hospital,"
Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-6, February.
- Ahmad Tubaishat & Panos Papanikolaou & Denis Anthony & Laila Habiballah, 2018.
"Pressure Ulcers Prevalence in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review, 2000-2015,"
Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 27(6), pages 643-659, July.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:413-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.