IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i12p1480-1488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Atrophy and anarchy: third national survey of nursing skill‐mix and advanced nursing practice in ophthalmology

Author

Listed:
  • Wladyslawa J. Czuber‐Dochan
  • Christine G. Waterman
  • Heather A. Waterman

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aims of the study were to investigate the advanced nursing practice and the skill‐mix of nurses working in ophthalmology. Background. The expansion of new nursing roles in the United Kingdom in the past decade is set against the background of a nursing shortage. The plan to modernize the National Health Service and improve the efficiency and delivery of healthcare services as well as to reduce junior doctors’ hours contributes towards a profusion of new and more specialized and advanced nursing roles in various areas of nursing including ophthalmology. Design. A self‐reporting quantitative questionnaire was employed. The study used comparative and descriptive statistical tests. Method. The questionnaires were distributed to all ophthalmic hospitals and units in the United Kingdom. Hospital and unit managers were responsible for completing the questionnaires. Results. Out of a total 181 questionnaires 117 were returned. There is a downward trend in the total number of nurses working in ophthalmology. The results demonstrate more nurses working at an advanced level. However, there is a general confusion regarding role interpretation at the advanced level of practice, evident through the wide range of job titles being used. There was inconsistency in the qualifications expected of these nurses. Conclusion. Whilst there are more nurses working at an advanced level this is set against an ageing workforce and an overall decline in the number of nurses in ophthalmology. There is inconsistency in job titles, grades, roles and qualifications for nurses who work at an advanced or higher level of practice. The Agenda for Change with its new structure for grading jobs in the United Kingdom may offer protection and consistency in job titles, pay and qualifications for National Health Service nurse specialists. The Nursing and Midwifery Council needs to provide clear guidelines to the practitioners on educational and professional requirements, to protect patients and nurses. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings indicate that there is a need for better regulations for nurses working at advanced nursing practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Wladyslawa J. Czuber‐Dochan & Christine G. Waterman & Heather A. Waterman, 2006. "Atrophy and anarchy: third national survey of nursing skill‐mix and advanced nursing practice in ophthalmology," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(12), pages 1480-1488, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:12:p:1480-1488
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01455.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01455.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01455.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Buchan & Lynn Calman, 2005. "Skill-Mix and Policy Change in the Health Workforce: Nurses in Advanced Roles," OECD Health Working Papers 17, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Productivity Commission, 2006. "Australia's Health Workforce," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 18.
    2. Simon Jean-Baptiste Combes & Alain Paraponaris & Yann Videau, 2019. "French GPs’ Willingness to Delegate Tasks: May Financial Incentives Balance Risk Aversion?," Working Papers halshs-02071522, HAL.
    3. Sandra Pol-Castañeda & Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Calero & Concepción Zaforteza-Lallemand & Carlos Javier Villafáfila-Gomila & Ian Blanco-Mavillard & Francisco Ferrer-Cruz & Joan De Pedro-Gómez, 2020. "Moving Evidence into Practice by Advanced Practice Nurses in Hospitalization Wards. Protocol for a Multicentre Quasi-Experimental Study in Three Hospitals in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Kroezen, Marieke & Dussault, Gilles & Craveiro, Isabel & Dieleman, Marjolein & Jansen, Christel & Buchan, James & Barriball, Louise & Rafferty, Anne Marie & Bremner, Jeni & Sermeus, Walter, 2015. "Recruitment and retention of health professionals across Europe: A literature review and multiple case study research," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(12), pages 1517-1528.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/14979 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Temido, Marta & Dussault, Gilles, 2015. "How can a country learn from the experience of another? Expanding nurses’ scope of practice in Portugal: Lessons from England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(4), pages 475-487.
    7. Mousquès, Julien & Bourgueil, Yann & Le Fur, Philippe & Yilmaz, Engin, 2010. "Effect of a French experiment of team work between general practitioners and nurses on efficacy and cost of type 2 diabetes patients care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(2-3), pages 131-143, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:12:p:1480-1488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.