IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i11p1376-1382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ perceptions of their documentation experiences in a computerized nursing care planning system

Author

Listed:
  • Ting‐Ting Lee

Abstract

Aim. To explore how the content design of a computerized nursing care plan affects nurses’ perceptions of their documentation experience, specifically in making care plans. Background. Nurses’ attitudes towards and experiences of computer use in daily practice have been studied. However, no studies have examined how using a computerized nursing care planning system affects nurses’ perceptions of the documentation process. Methods. A descriptive, exploratory qualitative approach was used to conduct one‐on‐one, in‐depth interviews with 20 nurses. The major interview question was, ‘What do you think the content of the computerized care plan provided in making care plans?’ Data analysis was based on Miles and Huberman's data reduction, data display, and a conclusion verification process. Findings. Nurses generally viewed the content of the computerized nursing care planning system as a reference to aid memory, a learning tool for patient care, and a vehicle for applying judgement to modify care plan content. Conclusions. Although computer technology is designed to streamline nurses’ work, using a computerized care plan system can also enhance their knowledge, experience and judgement of descriptions of patient problems and care strategies. Thus, the effects of using technology on documentation behaviours or patterns may deserve further exploration. Relevance to clinical practice. While computerized documentation systems have been used widely in patient care, little attention has been given to how the design of care plan content affects the documentation process. Electronic documentation systems can introduce nurses to new skills and knowledge that may improve care quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting‐Ting Lee, 2006. "Nurses’ perceptions of their documentation experiences in a computerized nursing care planning system," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(11), pages 1376-1382, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:11:p:1376-1382
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01480.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01480.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01480.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ulrika Pöder & Marie Fogelberg Dahm & Nina Karlsson & Barbro Wadensten, 2015. "Standardised care plans for in hospital stroke care improve documentation of health care assessments," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2788-2796, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:11:p:1376-1382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.