Author
Listed:
- F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi
- G. R. Jahanshahloo
- M. Khodabakhshi
- M. Rostamy-Malkhlifeh
- Z. Moghaddas
- M. Vaez-Ghasemi
Abstract
In the course of improving various abilities of data envelopment analysis (DEA) models, many investigations have been carried out for ranking decision‐making units (DMUs). This is an important issue both in theory and practice. There exist a variety of papers which apply different ranking methods to a real data set. Here the ranking methods are divided into seven groups. As each of the existing methods can be viewed from different aspects, it is possible that somewhat these groups have an overlapping with the others. The first group conducts the evaluation by a cross‐efficiency matrix where the units are self‐ and peer‐evaluated. In the second one, the ranking units are based on the optimal weights obtained from multiplier model of DEA technique. In the third group, super‐efficiency methods are dealt with which are based on the idea of excluding the unit under evaluation and analyzing the changes of frontier. The fourth group involves methods based on benchmarking, which adopts the idea of being a useful target for the inefficient units. The fourth group uses the multivariate statistical techniques, usually applied after conducting the DEA classification. The fifth research area ranks inefficient units through proportional measures of inefficiency. The sixth approach involves multiple‐criteria decision methodologies with the DEA technique. In the last group, some different methods of ranking units are mentioned.
Suggested Citation
F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & G. R. Jahanshahloo & M. Khodabakhshi & M. Rostamy-Malkhlifeh & Z. Moghaddas & M. Vaez-Ghasemi, 2013.
"A Review of Ranking Models in Data Envelopment Analysis,"
Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2013(1).
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2013:y:2013:i:1:n:492421
DOI: 10.1155/2013/492421
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2013:y:2013:i:1:n:492421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1155/4058 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.