IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v32y2020i3p408-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Livelihood Assets Contribute to Sustainable Development of Smallholder Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjing Li
  • Chuanmin Shuai
  • Yu Shuai
  • Xin Cheng
  • Yue Liu
  • Fubin Huang

Abstract

There is a knowledge gap and practical demand to understand the relationship between capitals for developing sustainable livelihoods to realize poverty reduction and sustainable development, in particular for the smallholder farmers. This paper intends to make sights into an important livelihood challenge faced by smallholder farmers, which also aims to find out strategy (ies) in accelerating smallholder farmers' poverty reduction and achieving sustainable development. More specifically, we used a hybrid approach by adopting both qualitative and quantitative methods along with the concept of sustainable livelihood approach to reveal six capitals of farmers' household capacity and their potential relationships. Based on an analysis of Grounded Theory for smallholder farmers, we proposed a newly built framework for smallholder farmers' sustainable livelihoods by taking the Psychological capital (Psycap) into the sustainable livelihoods' assets. With a total sample of 796 households representing 26 counties in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (TGRR) in China, we adopted the Structural Equation Modelling using partial least squares (PLS‐SEM) to explore the key factors and key paths affecting smallholder farmers' sustainable livelihoods. Results indicate that Psycap can effectively promote the performance of Human capital (Humcap) and Physical capital (Phycap), with both significant direct and significant indirect effects on sustainable livelihoods; Phycap and Humcap have significant impacts on the new sustainable livelihood index. Finally, this paper proposed corresponding policy recommendations for poverty alleviation and sustainable livelihoods of smallholder farmers. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjing Li & Chuanmin Shuai & Yu Shuai & Xin Cheng & Yue Liu & Fubin Huang, 2020. "How Livelihood Assets Contribute to Sustainable Development of Smallholder Farmers," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 408-429, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:32:y:2020:i:3:p:408-429
    DOI: 10.1002/jid.3461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3461
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jid.3461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Agbanyo & Godwin Musah & James Ntiamoah Doku & Joseph Quarshie & Nyuregbee Yahbewobr Dery, 2024. "Perceived political corruption and tax compliance intentions among private enterprises in emerging economies: The roles of tax morale and tax tolerance in Ghana," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 2063-2095, May.
    2. Wang, Yansong David & Xu, Tao Louie & Yuan, Cheng, 2024. "It Takes Three to Ceilidh: Pension System and Multidimensional Poverty Mitigation in China," SocArXiv xeaqt, Center for Open Science.
    3. Liu, Jing & Huang, Fubin & Wang, Zihan & Shuai, Chuanmin, 2021. "What is the anti-poverty effect of solar PV poverty alleviation projects? Evidence from rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Arhin, Patrick & Erdiaw-Kwasie, Michael Odei & Abunyewah, Matthew, 2022. "Displacements and livelihood resilience in Ghana's mining sector: The moderating role of coping behaviour," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Georgiana Toth & Alina Huzui-Stoiculescu & Alexandru-Ioan Toth & Robert Stoiculescu, 2020. "How Do Natura 2000 Areas Intersect with Peoples’ Livelihood Strategies in High Nature Value Farmlands in Southern Transylvania?," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Dipanwita De & Chandan Surabhi Das, 2021. "Measuring Livelihood Sustainability by PCA in Indian Sundarban," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18424-18442, December.
    7. Thai Thi Minh & Charity Osei‐Amponsah, 2021. "Towards poor‐centred value chain for sustainable development: A conceptual framework," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1223-1236, November.
    8. Jiaxin Wu & Jigang Zhang & Hongjuan Yang, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Farmers in Minority Areas after Poverty Alleviation Relocation: Based on an Improved Sustainable Livelihood Analysis Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Lili Geng & Yongji Xue, 2023. "Promoting ICT adoption in rural entrepreneurship: more neighbourhood effect or more institutional incentives?—Empirical evidence from China," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(6), pages 1530-1548, August.
    10. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    11. Ghulam Raza Sargani & Yuansheng Jiang & Abbas Ali Chandio & Yun Shen & Zhao Ding & Asif Ali, 2023. "Impacts of livelihood assets on adaptation strategies in response to climate change: evidence from Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6117-6140, July.
    12. Iketut Budastra & Taslim Syah & IGL. Partatanaya & Suparmin & Halil, 2024. "The Livelihood Strategies of Dry Land Farmers in Karang Bayan Village, Indonesia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 688-694, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:32:y:2020:i:3:p:408-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.