IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v29y2017i5p645-660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Without Sultan Qaboos, We Would Be Yemen’: The Renaissance Narrative and the Political Settlement in Oman

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Pospisil
  • Alina Rocha Menocal
  • Sarah G. Phillips
  • Jennifer S. Hunt

Abstract

Oman's developmental trajectory is a ‘positive outlier’ to most post‐colonial states, particularly those with significant natural resource reserves. Its trajectory confounds many of the usual expectations surrounding the impact of rentier incomes on conflict and inclusive development. This piece attempts to disentangle the threads of Oman's apparent good fortune to reveal characteristics of its political settlement that may (and may not) have salience elsewhere. This paper spotlights the influence of narrative and the non‐domestic factors that played pivotal roles in the formation and evolution of the political settlement, suggesting that both have generally been understated within the literature to date. © 2017 The Authors Journal of International Development Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Pospisil & Alina Rocha Menocal & Sarah G. Phillips & Jennifer S. Hunt, 2017. "‘Without Sultan Qaboos, We Would Be Yemen’: The Renaissance Narrative and the Political Settlement in Oman," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 645-660, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:29:y:2017:i:5:p:645-660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leon Goldsmith & Abdul Khalique Shaikh & Hacer Yildiz Tan & Kaamran Raahemifar, 2022. "A Review of Contemporary Governance Challenges in Oman: Can Blockchain Technology Be Part of Sustainable Solutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:29:y:2017:i:5:p:645-660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.