IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v28y2016i4p552-568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Untie Aid? An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of South Korea's Untied Aid from 2010 to 2013

Author

Listed:
  • Soyoon Chung
  • Young Ho Eom
  • Heon Joo Jung

Abstract

As untying aid was widely considered key to enhancing aid effectiveness, the South Korean government decided to increase the share of untied aid. While the share increased substantially in recent years, considerable variation exists in the proportion of untied aid provided to different recipient countries. This article explores the reasons why. We identify three key variables: international factors, economic interests and recipient country governance. By analysing South Korea's aid data for the period 2010–2013, we find that Korea's aid‐untying practice is affected by international norms and the recipient country's governance, but not by peer pressure and economic interests. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Soyoon Chung & Young Ho Eom & Heon Joo Jung, 2016. "Why Untie Aid? An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of South Korea's Untied Aid from 2010 to 2013," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 552-568, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:28:y:2016:i:4:p:552-568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geonwoo Park & Heon Joo Jung, 2020. "South Korea’s outward direct investment and its dyadic determinants: Foreign aid, bilateral treaty and economic diplomacy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 3296-3313, December.
    2. Jambadu, Lazarus & Monstadt, Jochen & Pilo', Francesca, 2024. "The politics of tied aid: Technology transfer and the maintenance and repair of water infrastructure," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:28:y:2016:i:4:p:552-568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.