IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v26y2014i5p658-667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doing Business: Using Ratings To Drive Reform

Author

Listed:
  • David Irwin

Abstract

The World Bank Doing Business results are widely used to promote reform—but they are based entirely on rankings that imply an equal spread between consecutive ranks and effectively ignores shortcomings in the research methodology. Rankings can mislead countries that have made an effort to reform can fall in the rankings even when they have improved if others have done even better. A scorecard based on ratings would provide a better overall picture of which countries are doing well and less well and enable countries to set more realistic targets for reform because they could then entirely focus on improving their rating. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • David Irwin, 2014. "Doing Business: Using Ratings To Drive Reform," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(5), pages 658-667, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:26:y:2014:i:5:p:658-667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jid.2906
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2016. "Robust Determinants of the Shadow Economy: An International Comparison," CESifo Working Paper Series 5873, CESifo.
    2. Nicky Rogge & Alena Kolyaseva, 2022. "Measuring and comparing World Bank regions’ ‘ease of doing business’ opportunity sets," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 131-155, April.
    3. Goel, Rajeev K. & Nelson, Michael A., 2016. "Shining a light on the shadows: Identifying robust determinants of the shadow economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 351-364.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:26:y:2014:i:5:p:658-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.