IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v18y2006i5p729-740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From inclusion to exclusion: armenian NGOs participation in the PRSP

Author

Listed:
  • Armine Ishkanian

    (London School of Economics, London, UK)

Abstract

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, donor agencies embraced the idea of civil society development as critical to democratisation and successful transition. The belief was that stronger civil societies would promote good governance, increased civic participation and social trust. Examining NGOs' participation in Armenia's PRSP process, this paper asks whether NGOs have played or have the potential to play a part in promoting good governance and sustainable development in Armenia through their participation in such initiatives as the PRSP. The paper uses the 'inclusion', 'exclusion' and 'hybrid' stances 1 to analyse the diverse approaches that local NGOs have embraced vis a vis the PRSP during the implementation stage. By analysing these stances, the paper demonstrates the diversity of Armenian civil society and considers how these stances affect NGOs ability to influence policy. 1 Albert Hirschman's (1970) study of exit, voice and loyalty was very useful in examining the stances of the NGOs, but his framework was not entirely applicable given the nature of the organisations under discussion as well as the politics and power dynamics involved. 'Stance' is used here to signify both the strategy and political or ideological positions of the NGOs. Michelle Rivkin-Fish (2004) uses a similar approach in discussing the strategies of global actors engaged in collaborative encounters with Russian health workers. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Armine Ishkanian, 2006. "From inclusion to exclusion: armenian NGOs participation in the PRSP," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(5), pages 729-740.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:18:y:2006:i:5:p:729-740
    DOI: 10.1002/jid.1301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jid.1301
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jid.1301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frances Stewart and Michael Wang, "undated". "Do PRSPs Empower Poor Countries And Disempower The World Bank, or is it the Other Way Round?," QEH Working Papers qehwps108, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    2. International Monetary Fund, 2003. "Republic of Armenia: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper," IMF Staff Country Reports 2003/362, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Warwick E. Murray & John D. Overton, 2011. "Neoliberalism is dead, long live neoliberalism? Neostructuralism and the international aid regime of the 2000s," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 11(4), pages 307-319, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arjan de Haan & Ward Warmerdam, 2012. "The politics of aid revisited: a review of evidence on state capacity and elite commitment," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-007-12, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    2. Mehedi Masud & Md. Rakib Hossain, 2021. "Interpreting lived experiences: The dilemmas of public sector leaders," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 180-190, October.
    3. Solava Ibrahim & David Hulme, 2010. "Has civil society helped the poor? - A review of the roles and contributions of civil society to poverty reduction?," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 11410, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    4. Arnim Langer and Frances Stewart (QEH), "undated". "Macro Adjustment Policies and Horizontal Inequalities," QEH Working Papers qehwps158, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    5. Poletti, Tim & Balabanova, Dina & Ghazaryan, Olga & Kocharyan, Hasmik & Hakobyan, Margarita & Arakelyan, Karen & Normand, Charles, 2007. "The desirability and feasibility of scaling up community health insurance in low-income settings--Lessons from Armenia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 509-520, February.
    6. Bach, Maria & Morgan, Mary S., 2020. "Measuring difference? The United Nations’ shift from progress to poverty," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101769, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. M. Morrison , Kevin & Singer, Matthew M., 2006. "The Challenges of “Deliberative Development”: Bolivia’s Experience with a National Dialogue," Documentos de trabajo 5/2006, Instituto de Investigaciones Socio-Económicas (IISEC), Universidad Católica Boliviana.
    8. Meg Elkins & Simon Feeny & David Prentice, 2015. "Do Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers reduce poverty and improve well-being?," Discussion Papers 15/02, University of Nottingham, School of Economics.
    9. Fahmida Khatun & Debapriya Bhattacharya & Mustafizur Rahman, 2013. "Revisiting the PRSP Experience in Bangladesh: Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Inclusiveness," CPD Working Paper 105, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    10. Sarah Hunt, 2015. "Breaking the rules, breaking the game: external ideas, politics and inclusive development in Honduras," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-052-15, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    11. Geske Dijkstra, 2015. "The New Aid Paradigm: A Case of Policy Incoherence," Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(02), pages 1-27.
    12. Jan Vandemoortele, 2004. "The MDGs and pro-poor polices: related but not synonymous," Working Papers 3, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:18:y:2006:i:5:p:729-740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.