IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v23y2003i9p859-890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An examination of the effectiveness of static hedging in the presence of stochastic volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Fink

Abstract

Toft and Xuan (1998) use simulation evidence to demonstrate that the static hedging method of Derman et al. (1995) performs inadequately when volatility is stochastic. Particularly, the greater the “volatility of volatility,” the poorer the static hedge. This article presents an alternative static hedging methodology, denoted the generalized static hedge, that appears to perform more reliably. Specifically, the value, delta, and vega of the static hedges closely approximate those values of the barrier option being hedged. Further, simulation evidence indicates that when volatility of volatility is large, the standard deviation of simulated cash flows from the generalized static hedge position is less than the standard deviation of simulated cash flows from previously defined static hedge positions. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 23:859–890, 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Fink, 2003. "An examination of the effectiveness of static hedging in the presence of stochastic volatility," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(9), pages 859-890, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:23:y:2003:i:9:p:859-890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akihiko Takahashi & Yukihiro Tsuzuki & Akira Yamazaki, 2010. "Hedging European Derivatives with the Polynomial Variance Swap under Uncertain Volatility Environments," CARF F-Series CARF-F-238, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    2. Jeonggyu Huh & Jaegi Jeon & Yong-Ki Ma, 2020. "Static Hedges of Barrier Options Under Fast Mean-Reverting Stochastic Volatility," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(1), pages 185-210, January.
    3. Yunbi An & Wulin Suo, 2009. "An Empirical Comparison of Option‐Pricing Models in Hedging Exotic Options," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 38(4), pages 889-914, December.
    4. Akihiko Takahashi & Yukihiro Tsuzuki & Akira Yamazaki, 2011. "Hedging European Derivatives With The Polynomial Variance Swap Under Uncertain Volatility Environments," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 485-505.
    5. Frido Rolloos & Kenichiro Shiraya, 2024. "A model‐free approximation for barrier options in a general stochastic volatility framework," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 923-935, June.
    6. San‐Lin Chung & Yi‐Ta Huang & Pai‐Ta Shih & Jr‐Yan Wang, 2019. "Semistatic hedging and pricing American floating strike lookback options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 418-434, April.
    7. Hideharu Funahashi & Masaaki Kijima, 2016. "Analytical pricing of single barrier options under local volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 867-886, June.
    8. Akihiko Takahashi & Yukihiro Tsuzuki & Akira Yamazaki, 2009. "Hedging European Derivatives with the Polynomial Variance Swap under Uncertain Volatility Environments," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-653, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    9. Hansjörg Albrecher & Philipp Mayer, 2010. "Semi-Static Hedging Strategies For Exotic Options," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Rüdiger Kiesel & Matthias Scherer & Rudi Zagst (ed.), Alternative Investments And Strategies, chapter 14, pages 345-373, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:23:y:2003:i:9:p:859-890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.