IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v23y2003i6p603-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of liquidity constraints on futures hedging

Author

Listed:
  • Donald Lien

Abstract

This article assumes that because of liquidity constraints, a hedge program will be terminated if the cumulative loss from a futures position exceeds a certain threshold. The constraint leads to a smaller futures position. If the hedger has a quadratic utility function, then the optimal futures position is constant regardless of the parameter values and increases as the spot position or the conventional hedge ratio increases. When the capital allocation is small, the hedger tends to ignore this restriction and chooses a larger position. Consequently, the optimal position may decrease as the capital allocation increases. For a moderate capital allocation, the optimal position increases with an increasing capital allocation. Similar properties are established for exponential utility functions. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 23:603–613, 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Donald Lien, 2003. "The effect of liquidity constraints on futures hedging," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(6), pages 603-613, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:23:y:2003:i:6:p:603-613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shi, Ruoding & Isengildina Massa, Olga, 2018. "Double-Edged Sword: Liquidity Implications of Futures Hedging," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274106, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Shi, Ruoding & Isengildina Massa, Olga, 2022. "Costs of Futures Hedging in Corn and Soybean Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(2), May.
    3. Olaf Korn & Alexander Merz, 2019. "How to hedge if the payment date is uncertain?," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 481-498, April.
    4. Yan Hu & Jian Ni, 2024. "A deep learning‐based financial hedging approach for the effective management of commodity risks," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 879-900, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:23:y:2003:i:6:p:603-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.