IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v22y2002i12p1147-1178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic significance of risk premiums in the S&P 500 option market

Author

Listed:
  • R. Brian Balyeat

Abstract

Option pricing is complicated by the theoretical existence of risk premiums. This article utilizes a testable methodology to extract the pricing impact resulting from these risk premiums. First, option prices (based on the full dynamics of the underlying) are computed under the assumption that these risk premiums are not priced. The pricing methodology is independent of any particular option‐pricing model or distributional assumptions on the return process for the underlying. The difference between the actual market prices and these “no‐premium base case” prices reflects the effect of risk premiums. For at‐the‐money, 13‐week S&P 500 options trading from 1989 until 1993, the effect of risk premiums is statistically significant and averages slightly over 20% (in units of Black–Scholes implied volatility). A simple delta‐hedging strategy is used to demonstrate the economic significance of risk premiums, as the trading strategy provides enough profit to absorb a crash similar in magnitude to the 1987 crash once every 6.20 years. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 22:1147–1178, 2002

Suggested Citation

  • R. Brian Balyeat, 2002. "Economic significance of risk premiums in the S&P 500 option market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(12), pages 1147-1178, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:22:y:2002:i:12:p:1147-1178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Tompkins, 2006. "Why Smiles Exist in Foreign Exchange Options Markets: Isolating Components of the Risk Neutral Process," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(6-7), pages 583-603.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:22:y:2002:i:12:p:1147-1178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.