IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jforec/v44y2025i2p356-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affinities and Complementarities of Methods and Information Sets in the Estimation of Prices in Real Estate Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Mirko S. Bozanic‐Leal
  • Marcel Goic
  • Charles Thraves

Abstract

In this article, we evaluate the predictive power of multiple machine learning methods using different sets of information, such as location, amenities, socioeconomic characteristics, and available infrastructure nearby, in both residential and commercial real estate markets. This analysis allows us to understand what type of information is the most relevant for each market, which methods are best suited for certain explanatory variables, and the degree of complementarity among different covariates. Our results indicate that the combination of multiple data sources consistently leads to better forecasting and that flexible machine learning models outperform linear regression or spatial methods by taking advantage of the complex interactions between explanatory variables of different sources. From a substantive point of view, we found that residential sale markets have a higher prediction error compared with their rent counterparts, with house sales being the market with the largest estimation error. In terms of the explanatory power of different information sets in different markets, we observe that socioeconomic and location variables have the highest impact on the prediction for sale markets and that, in relative terms, amenities and proximity to places of interest are more important for rental than sale residential markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirko S. Bozanic‐Leal & Marcel Goic & Charles Thraves, 2025. "Affinities and Complementarities of Methods and Information Sets in the Estimation of Prices in Real Estate Markets," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 356-375, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:44:y:2025:i:2:p:356-375
    DOI: 10.1002/for.3202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/for.3202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:44:y:2025:i:2:p:356-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.